[PATCH] soc: ti: pm33xx: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
Nishanth Menon
nm at ti.com
Tue May 3 06:08:09 PDT 2022
Hi cgel.zte at gmail.com,
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 06:30:59 +0000, cgel.zte at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao at zte.com.cn>
>
> Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
> for simplifing code
>
>
I have applied the following to branch ti-drivers-soc-next on [1].
Thank you!
[1/1] soc: ti: pm33xx: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
commit: 2b7042500cab7952bdbf4fe4a84de8712b418c36
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent up the chain during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a relevant bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
[1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ti/linux.git
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list