[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Fix optional reg-names for mtk,scp
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com
Tue May 3 05:26:15 PDT 2022
Il 03/05/22 14:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
> On 29/04/2022 23:11, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
>> The SCP has three memory regions: sram, l1tcm and cfg. Only sram is
>> required, the other two are optional. Fix the dt-binding so that the
>> optional regions can be omitted and passed in any order.
>
> No, cannot be passed in any order.
>
>>
>> Also add the missing minItems to the reg property and update the
>> description.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado at collabora.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml | 12 +++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
>> index 823a236242de..ec9ddeb6ca2c 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
>> @@ -24,14 +24,20 @@ properties:
>> reg:
>> description:
>> Should contain the address ranges for memory regions SRAM, CFG, and
>> - L1TCM.
>> + L1TCM. Only SRAM is required, while CFG and L1TCM are optional.
>> + minItems: 1
>> maxItems: 3
>>
>> reg-names:
>> + minItems: 1
>> items:
>> - const: sram
>> - - const: cfg
>> - - const: l1tcm
>> + - enum:
>> + - l1tcm
>> + - cfg
>> + - enum:
>> + - l1tcm
>> + - cfg
>
> This allows them in any combination which is not what we want. If both
> are optional and both can appear, then last should be a const:l1tcm.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Nicolas, I think that you weren't clear about what you're trying to solve with this
commit in the description.
I remember you had this kind of instance, but I don't really remember if it was
about mtk,scp or (and?) something else.... so.... are you trying to fix issues
with devicetrees declaring
reg-names = "sram", "l1tcm"; ?
Was this giving dtbs_check errors?
Cheers,
Angelo
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list