[PATCH v18 08/21] soc: mediatek: add mtk-mutex support for mt8195 vdosys1

Nancy.Lin nancy.lin at mediatek.com
Mon May 2 19:50:03 PDT 2022


Hi CK,

Thanks for the review.

On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 17:29 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, Nancy:
> 
> On Thu, 2022-04-28 at 18:53 +0800, Nancy.Lin wrote:
> > Add mtk-mutex support for mt8195 vdosys1.
> > The vdosys1 path component contains ovl_adaptor, merge5,
> > and dp_intf1. Ovl_adaptor is composed of several sub-elements
> > which include MDP_RDMA0~7, MERGE0~3, and ETHDR.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nancy.Lin <nancy.lin at mediatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> > angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c | 37
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > index 981d56967e7a..78197ebf5595 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > @@ -110,6 +110,24 @@
> >  #define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DP_INTF0		21
> >  #define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_PWM0		27
> >  
> > +#define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_MDP_RDMA0	0
> > +#define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_MDP_RDMA1	1
> > +#define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_MDP_RDMA2	2
> > +#define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_MDP_RDMA3	3
> > +#define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_MDP_RDMA4	4
> > +#define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_MDP_RDMA5	5
> > +#define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_MDP_RDMA6	6
> > +#define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_MDP_RDMA7	7
> > +#define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_VPP_MERGE0	8
> > +#define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_VPP_MERGE1	9
> > +#define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_VPP_MERGE2	10
> > +#define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_VPP_MERGE3	11
> > +#define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_VPP_MERGE4	12
> > +#define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_DISP_MIXER	18
> > +#define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_DPI0		25
> > +#define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_DPI1		26
> > +#define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_DP_INTF0		27
> > +
> >  #define MT2712_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_PWM2		10
> >  #define MT2712_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL0		11
> >  #define MT2712_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL1		12
> > @@ -313,6 +331,21 @@ static const unsigned int
> > mt8195_mutex_mod[DDP_COMPONENT_ID_MAX] = {
> >  	[DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0] = MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DSI0,
> >  	[DDP_COMPONENT_PWM0] = MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_PWM0,
> >  	[DDP_COMPONENT_DP_INTF0] = MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DP_INTF0,
> > +	[DDP_COMPONENT_MDP_RDMA0] = MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_MDP_RDMA0,
> > +	[DDP_COMPONENT_MDP_RDMA1] = MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_MDP_RDMA1,
> > +	[DDP_COMPONENT_MDP_RDMA2] = MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_MDP_RDMA2,
> > +	[DDP_COMPONENT_MDP_RDMA3] = MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_MDP_RDMA3,
> > +	[DDP_COMPONENT_MDP_RDMA4] = MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_MDP_RDMA4,
> > +	[DDP_COMPONENT_MDP_RDMA5] = MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_MDP_RDMA5,
> > +	[DDP_COMPONENT_MDP_RDMA6] = MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_MDP_RDMA6,
> > +	[DDP_COMPONENT_MDP_RDMA7] = MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_MDP_RDMA7,
> > +	[DDP_COMPONENT_MERGE1] = MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_VPP_MERGE0,
> > +	[DDP_COMPONENT_MERGE2] = MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_VPP_MERGE1,
> > +	[DDP_COMPONENT_MERGE3] = MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_VPP_MERGE2,
> > +	[DDP_COMPONENT_MERGE4] = MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_VPP_MERGE3,
> > +	[DDP_COMPONENT_ETHDR_MIXER] =
> > MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_DISP_MIXER,
> > +	[DDP_COMPONENT_MERGE5] = MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_VPP_MERGE4,
> > +	[DDP_COMPONENT_DP_INTF1] = MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP1_DP_INTF0,
> >  };
> >  
> >  static const unsigned int mt2712_mutex_sof[DDP_MUTEX_SOF_MAX] = {
> > @@ -498,6 +531,9 @@ void mtk_mutex_add_comp(struct mtk_mutex
> > *mutex,
> >  	case DDP_COMPONENT_DP_INTF0:
> >  		sof_id = MUTEX_SOF_DP_INTF0;
> >  		break;
> > +	case DDP_COMPONENT_DP_INTF1:
> > +		sof_id = MUTEX_SOF_DP_INTF1;
> 
> This is not strongly related to mt8195, so move this to an
> independent
> patch.
> 
OK, I will separate this to an independent patch.

Regards,
Nancy

> > +		break;
> >  	default:
> >  		if (mtx->data->mutex_mod[id] < 32) {
> >  			offset = DISP_REG_MUTEX_MOD(mtx->data-
> > > mutex_mod_reg,
> > 
> > @@ -538,6 +574,7 @@ void mtk_mutex_remove_comp(struct mtk_mutex
> > *mutex,
> >  	case DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0:
> >  	case DDP_COMPONENT_DPI1:
> >  	case DDP_COMPONENT_DP_INTF0:
> > +	case DDP_COMPONENT_DP_INTF1:
> 
> Ditto.
> 
> Regards,
> CK
> 
> >  		writel_relaxed(MUTEX_SOF_SINGLE_MODE,
> >  			       mtx->regs +
> >  			       DISP_REG_MUTEX_SOF(mtx->data-
> > > mutex_sof_reg,
> 
> 




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list