[PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add PRU consumer bindings
Rob Herring
robh at kernel.org
Mon May 2 12:56:38 PDT 2022
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 04:11:14PM +0530, Puranjay Mohan wrote:
> From: Suman Anna <s-anna at ti.com>
>
> Add a YAML binding document for PRU consumers. The binding includes
> all the common properties that can be used by different PRU consumer
> or application nodes and supported by the PRU remoteproc driver.
> These are used to configure the PRU hardware for specific user
> applications.
>
> The application nodes themselves should define their own bindings.
>
> Co-developed-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo at ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo at ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna at ti.com>
> Co-developed-by: Grzegorz Jaszczyk <grzegorz.jaszczyk at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Jaszczyk <grzegorz.jaszczyk at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <p-mohan at ti.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,pru-consumer.yaml | 70 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,pru-consumer.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,pru-consumer.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,pru-consumer.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5b1f1cb2f098
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,pru-consumer.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only or BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/ti,pru-consumer.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Common TI PRU Consumer Binding
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Suman Anna <s-anna at ti.com>
> +
> +description: |
> + A PRU application/consumer/user node typically uses one or more PRU device
> + nodes to implement a PRU application/functionality. Each application/client
> + node would need a reference to at least a PRU node, and optionally define
> + some properties needed for hardware/firmware configuration. The below
> + properties are a list of common properties supported by the PRU remoteproc
> + infrastructure.
> +
> + The application nodes shall define their own bindings like regular platform
> + devices, so below are in addition to each node's bindings.
> +
> +properties:
> + ti,prus:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> + description: phandles to the PRU, RTU or Tx_PRU nodes used
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 6
> + items:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + firmware-name:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string-array
> + description: |
> + firmwares for the PRU cores, the default firmware for the core from
> + the PRU node will be used if not provided. The firmware names should
> + correspond to the PRU cores listed in the 'ti,prus' property
So should be the name number of entries?:
minItems: 1
maxItems: 6
> +
> + ti,pruss-gp-mux-sel:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 6
> + items:
> + enum: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
> + description: |
> + array of values for the GP_MUX_SEL under PRUSS_GPCFG register for a PRU.
> + This selects the internal muxing scheme for the PRU instance. Values
> + should correspond to the PRU cores listed in the 'ti,prus' property. The
> + GP_MUX_SEL setting is a per-slice setting (one setting for PRU0, RTU0,
> + and Tx_PRU0 on K3 SoCs). Use the same value for all cores within the
> + same slice in the associative array. If the array size is smaller than
> + the size of 'ti,prus' property, the default out-of-reset value (0) for the
> + PRU core is used.
> +
> +required:
> + - ti,prus
> +
> +dependencies:
> + firmware-name: [ 'ti,prus' ]
> + ti,pruss-gp-mux-sel: [ 'ti,prus' ]
This doesn't make sense because 'ti,prus' is already required. Should
all 3 properties always be required?
> +
> +additionalProperties: true
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + /* PRU application node example */
> + pru-app {
> + ti,prus = <&pru0>, <&pru1>;
> + firmware-name = "pruss-app-fw0", "pruss-app-fw1";
> + ti,pruss-gp-mux-sel = <2>, <1>;
This example never validates, but okay I guess.
> + };
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list