[PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: phy: uniphier-ahci: Fix missing reset-names

Kunihiko Hayashi hayashi.kunihiko at socionext.com
Tue Mar 29 03:55:58 PDT 2022


Hi Krzysztof,

Thank you for reviewing.

On 2022/03/29 3:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/03/2022 04:05, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
>> Add missing "phy" reset-names to fix the following warning:
>>
>>    uniphier-pro4-ace.dtb: ahci-phy at 10: resets: [[26, 28], [26, 12], [26,
>> 30], [36, 0], [36, 1], [36, 2]] is too long
>>        From schema:
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml
>>    uniphier-pro4-ace.dtb: ahci-phy at 10: reset-names: 'oneOf' conditional
>> failed, one must be fixed:
>>        ['link', 'gio', 'phy', 'pm', 'tx', 'rx'] is too long
>>        From schema:
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml
> 
> There is no ahci-phy in current sources...

Oops, I'm going to add ahci controller to the existing devicetree,
but not yet. I shouldn't write the future warning in the commit message,
so I'll fix it.

>>
>> Fixes: 34f92b67621f ("dt-bindings: phy: uniphier-ahci: Add bindings for
>> Pro4 SoC")
>> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko at socionext.com>
>> ---
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml   | 3 ++-
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml
>> index 3b400a85b44a..14f7579e7daa 100644
>> ---
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml
>> +++
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml
>> @@ -43,13 +43,14 @@ properties:
>>
>>     resets:
>>       minItems: 2
>> -    maxItems: 5
>> +    maxItems: 6
>>
>>     reset-names:
>>       oneOf:
> 
> As a separate commit, this oneOf should be converted into allOf:if:then:
> cases which will enforce the resets per compatible.
> 
> Can you do that as well?

Ok, I've found some examples using "allOf:if:them:" cases,
so I'll try to convert it with another commit.

Thank you,

---
Best Regards
Kunihiko Hayashi



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list