[PATCH v2] ARM: dts: spear13xx: Update SPI dma properties

Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar at linaro.org
Wed Mar 23 19:39:04 PDT 2022


On 23-03-22, 23:29, Kuldeep Singh wrote:
> Reorder dmas and dma-names property for spi controller node to make it
> compliant with bindings.
> 
> Fixes: 6e8887f60f60 ("ARM: SPEAr13xx: Pass generic DW DMAC platform data from DT")
> Signed-off-by: Kuldeep Singh <singh.kuldeep87k at gmail.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Add fixes tag
> - Remove 1/2 patch from series as it's not required
> - v1 discussion link:
>   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220312180615.68929-2-singh.kuldeep87k@gmail.com/
> 
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/spear13xx.dtsi | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/spear13xx.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/spear13xx.dtsi
> index c87b881b2c8b..45f0b2a33e02 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/spear13xx.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/spear13xx.dtsi
> @@ -284,9 +284,8 @@ spi0: spi at e0100000 {
>  				#size-cells = <0>;
>  				interrupts = <0 31 0x4>;
>  				status = "disabled";
> -				dmas = <&dwdma0 4 0 0>,
> -					<&dwdma0 5 0 0>;
> -				dma-names = "tx", "rx";
> +				dmas = <&dwdma0 5 0 0>, <&dwdma0 4 0 0>;
> +				dma-names = "rx", "tx";
>  			};
>  
>  			rtc at e0580000 {

Rob,

I tried to ask this at V1 as well [1]. Why do we need a patch like
this ? Isn't this a DT tooling issue, where it is asking for a fixed
order of values ?

-- 
viresh

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220312180615.68929-2-singh.kuldeep87k@gmail.com/



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list