[PATCH v4 08/22] arm64: dts: mt8192: Add infracfg_rst node

[allen-kh.cheng]

Hi Nícolas,

On Tue, 2022-03-22 at 17:57 -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> Hi Allen,
> 
> please see my comment below.
> 
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:45:20PM +0800, Allen-KH Cheng wrote:
> > Add infracfg_rst node for mt8192 SoC.
> >  - Add simple-mfd to allow probing the ti,syscon-reset node.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Allen-KH Cheng <allen-kh.cheng at mediatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> > angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi
> > index 40cf6dacca3e..82de1af3f6aa 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> >  #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt8192-pinfunc.h>
> >  #include <dt-bindings/phy/phy.h>
> >  #include <dt-bindings/power/mt8192-power.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/reset/ti-syscon.h>
> >  
> >  / {
> >  	compatible = "mediatek,mt8192";
> > @@ -267,10 +268,23 @@
> >  			#clock-cells = <1>;
> >  		};
> >  
> > -		infracfg: syscon at 10001000 {
> > -			compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-infracfg",
> > "syscon";
> > +		infracfg: infracfg at 10001000 {
> > +			compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-infracfg",
> > "syscon", "simple-mfd";
> >  			reg = <0 0x10001000 0 0x1000>;
> >  			#clock-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > +			infracfg_rst: reset-controller {
> > +				compatible = "ti,syscon-reset";
> > +				#reset-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > +				ti,reset-bits = <
> > +					0x120 0 0x124 0 0 0	(ASSERT_SET
> > | DEASSERT_SET | STATUS_NONE) /* 0: lvts_ap */
> > +					0x730 12 0x734 12 0 0	(AS
> > SERT_SET | DEASSERT_SET | STATUS_NONE) /* 1: lvts_mcu */
> > +					0x140 15 0x144 15 0 0	(AS
> > SERT_SET | DEASSERT_SET | STATUS_NONE) /* 2: pcie phy */
> > +					0x730 1 0x734 1 0 0	(ASSERT_SET
> > | DEASSERT_SET | STATUS_NONE) /* 3: pcie top */
> > +					0x150 5 0x154 5 0 0	(ASSERT_SET
> > | DEASSERT_SET | STATUS_NONE) /* 4: svs */
> > +				>;
> 
> If you see [1], Rob has previously said that there shouldn't be new
> users of the
> ti,reset-bits property. I suggest doing like proposed on [2]: moving
> these bit
> definitions to the reset-ti-syscon driver, and have them selected
> through the
> compatible. You'd need to add a mt8192 specific compatible here too
> for that.
> 
> [1] 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_JsqJq6gqoXtvG1U7UDsOQpz7oMLMunZHq2njN6nvPr8PZMA@mail.gmail.com/__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!1wQAhHnu8bAxe2O51XZ61oWVQU7EFEZcgluzwgP4x4VHRxtb6kAySvsKCGzv8cs8IzVjanDNzBQvOa_Y4OABdRVOzg$
>  
> [2] 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAATdQgA5pKhjOf5gxo*h7cs7kCts3DeKGU5axeX2t*OaJFHyBg@mail.gmail.com/__;Kys!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!1wQAhHnu8bAxe2O51XZ61oWVQU7EFEZcgluzwgP4x4VHRxtb6kAySvsKCGzv8cs8IzVjanDNzBQvOa_Y4OBLvOYlyQ$
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> Nícolas
> 

Thanks for your comment.

For nfracfg_rst node, I prefer remove it from this series and
send another patch series(dts and driver).

Based on [2], is it ok that we can add mt8192 compatible in reset-ti
syscon driver? (even if mt8192 is a mediatek platform)

best regards,
Allen

> > +			};
> >  		};
> >  
> >  		pericfg: syscon at 10003000 {
> > -- 
> > 2.18.0
> > 
> >