[PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: Add i.MX8MP media block control DT bindings

[Marek Vasut]

On 3/22/22 22:57, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Marek,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:29:56PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 3/22/22 20:03, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> From: Paul Elder <paul.elder at ideasonboard.com>
>>>
>>> The i.MX8MP Media Block Control (MEDIA BLK_CTRL) is a top-level
>>> peripheral providing access to the NoC and ensuring proper power
>>> sequencing of the peripherals within the MEDIAMIX domain. Add DT
>>> bindings for it.
>>>
>>> There is already a driver for block controls of other SoCs in the i.MX8M
>>> family, so these bindings will expand upon that.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder at ideasonboard.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +        power-domain-names = "bus", "mipi-dsi1", "mipi-csi1", "lcdif1", "isi",
>>> +                             "mipi-csi2", "lcdif2", "isp2", "isp1", "dwe",
>>> +                             "mipi-dsi2";
>>
>> Nit, I cannot say I'm a big fan of calling the power domain "mipi-csi1"
>> and "mipi-csi2", they are both MIPI CSI2, except there are two of them
>> CSI2 (#1 and #2).
>>
>> Maybe mipi-csi2-1 and mipi-csi2-2 would be better ? DTTO for the LCDIF,
>> where we have lcdifv3 and then mx8mp lcdifv3 and eventually we will have
>> power domain for lcdif #3 instance in this SoC in hdmimix, so maybe some
>> lcdif-1/lcdif-2 would be a better name ?
> 
> The names come from the reference manual, at least the ones for the
> second instance. We have, for instance, SFT_EN_MIPI_CSI_PCLK_RESETN and
> SFT_EN_MIPI_CSI2_PCLK_RESETN. Same for DSI and LCDIF, there's DSI and
> DSI2, and LCDIF and LCDIF2. The "1" suffix has been added for clarity.
> 
> This is a bit bikeshedding territory as I expect the DT node for the
> media-blk-ctrl to be written once and never be touched again, so if
> anyone feels strongly about using better names (whatever those better
> names would be), I don't mind much.
> 
> I can submit a v3 once a consensus emerges.

I don't feel strongly about it, I just wanted to point it out.
Let's wait for the others' opinions.