[PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: clock: drop useless consumer example

Jesse Taube mr.bossman075 at gmail.com
Mon Mar 21 18:45:28 PDT 2022



On 3/21/22 14:23, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 02:08:58PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Consumer examples in the bindings of resource providers are trivial,
>> useless and duplication of code.  Remove the example code for consumer
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at canonical.com>
>> ---
>>   .../bindings/clock/bitmain,bm1880-clk.yaml           | 12 ------------
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/clock/idt,versaclock5.yaml   |  7 -------
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/clock/imx1-clock.yaml        |  9 ---------
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/clock/imx21-clock.yaml       |  9 ---------
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/clock/imx23-clock.yaml       |  9 ---------
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/clock/imx25-clock.yaml       |  8 --------
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/clock/imx27-clock.yaml       |  9 ---------
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/clock/imx28-clock.yaml       |  9 ---------
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/clock/imx31-clock.yaml       |  8 --------
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/clock/imx35-clock.yaml       |  8 --------
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/clock/imx7ulp-pcc-clock.yaml | 11 -----------
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/clock/imx7ulp-scg-clock.yaml | 11 -----------
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/clock/imx8qxp-lpcg.yaml      | 11 -----------
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/clock/imxrt1050-clock.yaml   |  8 --------
>>   .../bindings/clock/nvidia,tegra124-car.yaml          |  7 -------
>>   .../bindings/clock/nvidia,tegra20-car.yaml           |  7 -------
>>   16 files changed, 143 deletions(-)
> 
> Doesn't apply to my tree (no imxrt1050-clock.yaml), so
merge against linux-next I can submit another patch if needed.
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list