Aw: Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: mt7623: increase passive cooling trip
Frank Wunderlich
frank-w at public-files.de
Sat Mar 5 08:37:11 PST 2022
Hi Kurt,
> Gesendet: Samstag, 05. März 2022 um 16:54 Uhr
> Von: "Kurt Fitzner" <kurt at va1der.ca>
> This issue and patch just came to my attention, my apologies for late
> comments.
>
> The solution provided in this patch is, I believe, not optimal.
does your Patch fixes the issue? if yes you can send a Patch based on current mainline dts.
it looks a bit weired to me having active before passive...but i'm no expert in the cooling trips.
i just increased the temps :)
please see notes below
> On 2021-07-25 1:34 p.m., Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> > From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w at public-files.de>
> >
> > MT7623/BPI-R2 has idle temperature after bootup from 48 degrees celsius
> > increase the passive trip temp threshold to not trottle CPU frequency at
> > this temperature
>
> The dts file for the mt7623 has four trip points:
> - Trip point 0, Type=Passive @ 47°C (originally, now 57°C)
> - Trip point 1, Type=Active @ 67°C
> - Trip point 2, Type=Hot @ 87°C
> - Trip point 3, Type=Critical @ 107°C
>
> It makes little sense to have passive CPU throttling employed *before*
> engaging a fan. Generally users want a fan (if present) to be engaged
> before intentional performance degradation is employed.
>
> > cpu_passive: cpu-passive {
> > - temperature = <47000>;
> > + temperature = <57000>;
>
> The old temperature of 47°C appears, in practice, to be a good
> temperature for an active cooling trip point. It is just above the
> temperature that a generally idle mt7623 sits at in enclosures where
> this SoC is employed, but also a temperature that a CPU under load will
> quickly reach.
>
> Therefore I propose the types of trip points 0 and 1 be reversed and the
> temperatures left as they were.
>
>
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi 2022-02-27 18:36:33 -0400
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi 2022-03-05 11:37:52 -0400
> @@ -158,19 +158,19 @@
>
> thermal-sensors = <&thermal 0>;
>
> trips {
> cpu_passive: cpu-passive {
> - temperature = <57000>;
> + temperature = <47000>;
> hysteresis = <2000>;
> - type = "passive";
> + type = "active";
> };
if type is different, imho the name+label should be changed too
> cpu_active: cpu-active {
> temperature = <67000>;
> hysteresis = <2000>;
> - type = "active";
> + type = "passive";
> };
dito
> cpu_hot: cpu-hot {
> temperature = <87000>;
> hysteresis = <2000>;
regards Frank
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list