[PATCH v2, 04/10] media: mtk-vcodec: Enable venc dual core usage
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com
Fri Mar 4 01:07:13 PST 2022
Il 04/03/22 03:12, Irui Wang ha scritto:
> Hello, Angelo,
>
> Many thanks for your review.
>
> On Thu, 2022-03-03 at 15:27 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 17/01/22 13:06, Irui Wang ha scritto:
>>> Adds new venc core mode to indicate different venc hardware mode:
>>> VENC_SINGLE_CORE_MODE means only one core, the device has its own
>>> power/clk/irq, init_clk/request_irq helper can be used.
>>>
>>> VENC_DUAL_CORE_MODE means more than one core inside, the core
>>> device
>>> can use the init_clk/request_irq helper to initialize their own
>>> power/clk/irq. And the main device doesn't need use these helper
>>> anymore.
>>>
>>> MT8195 has two H264 venc cores, enable dual_core_mode for it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Irui Wang <irui.wang at mediatek.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/Makefile | 4 +-
>>> .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h | 22 +++
>>> .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_core.c | 153
>>> ++++++++++++++++++
>>> .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_core.h | 36 +++++
>>> .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_drv.c | 88 +++++-----
>>> 5 files changed, 266 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/mtk-
>>> vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_core.c
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/mtk-
>>> vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_core.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/Makefile
>>> b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/Makefile
>>> index 93e7a343b5b0..c472b221bd6b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/Makefile
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/Makefile
>>> @@ -3,7 +3,8 @@
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_MEDIATEK_VCODEC) += mtk-vcodec-dec.o \
>>> mtk-vcodec-enc.o \
>>> mtk-vcodec-common.o \
>>> - mtk-vcodec-dec-hw.o
>>> + mtk-vcodec-dec-hw.o \
>>> + mtk-vcodec-enc-core.o
>>>
>>> mtk-vcodec-dec-y := vdec/vdec_h264_if.o \
>>> vdec/vdec_vp8_if.o \
>>> @@ -32,6 +33,7 @@ mtk-vcodec-enc-y := venc/venc_vp8_if.o \
>>> venc_drv_if.o \
>>> venc_vpu_if.o \
>>>
>>> +mtk-vcodec-enc-core-y := mtk_vcodec_enc_core.o
>>>
>>> mtk-vcodec-common-y := mtk_vcodec_intr.o \
>>> mtk_vcodec_util.o \
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h
>>> b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h
>>> index f78463ff4551..9e4e4290a69a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h
>>> @@ -117,6 +117,23 @@ enum mtk_vdec_hw_count {
>>> MTK_VDEC_MAX_HW_COUNT,
>>> };
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * enum mtk_venc_core_id -- encoder core id
>>> + */
>>> +enum mtk_venc_core_id {
>>> + MTK_VENC_CORE0 = 0,
>>> + MTK_VENC_CORE1 = 1,
>>
>> You don't have to say "= 1" for core1, just...
>>
>> MTK_VENC_CORE0 = 0,
>> MTK_VENC_CORE1,
>>
>> ...is fine, and better.
>
> I will fix it.
>
>>
>>> + MTK_VENC_CORE_MAX,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * enmu mtk_venc_core_mode - Used to indicate different encode
>>> mode
>>> + */
>>> +enum mtk_venc_core_mode {
>>> + VENC_SINGLE_CORE_MODE = 0,
>>> + VENC_DUAL_CORE_MODE = 1,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> * struct mtk_video_fmt - Structure used to store information
>>> about pixelformats
>>> */
>>> @@ -420,6 +437,7 @@ struct mtk_vcodec_dec_pdata {
>>> * @output_formats: array of supported output formats
>>> * @num_output_formats: number of entries in output_formats
>>> * @core_type: stand for h264 or vp8 encode
>>> + * @core_mode: indicate encode core mode
>>> */
>>> struct mtk_vcodec_enc_pdata {
>>> bool uses_ext;
>>> @@ -430,6 +448,7 @@ struct mtk_vcodec_enc_pdata {
>>> const struct mtk_video_fmt *output_formats;
>>> size_t num_output_formats;
>>> int core_type;
>>> + enum mtk_venc_core_mode core_mode;
>>> };
>>>
>>> #define MTK_ENC_CTX_IS_EXT(ctx) ((ctx)->dev->venc_pdata-
>>>> uses_ext)
>>> @@ -479,6 +498,7 @@ struct mtk_vcodec_enc_pdata {
>>> * @subdev_dev: subdev hardware device
>>> * @subdev_prob_done: check whether all used hw device is prob
>>> done
>>> * @subdev_bitmap: used to record hardware is ready or not
>>> + * @enc_core_dev: used to store venc core device
>>> */
>>> struct mtk_vcodec_dev {
>>> struct v4l2_device v4l2_dev;
>>> @@ -524,6 +544,8 @@ struct mtk_vcodec_dev {
>>> void *subdev_dev[MTK_VDEC_HW_MAX];
>>> int (*subdev_prob_done)(struct mtk_vcodec_dev *vdec_dev);
>>> DECLARE_BITMAP(subdev_bitmap, MTK_VDEC_HW_MAX);
>>> +
>>> + void *enc_core_dev[MTK_VENC_CORE_MAX];
>>> };
>>>
>>> static inline struct mtk_vcodec_ctx *fh_to_ctx(struct v4l2_fh
>>> *fh)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-
>>> vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_core.c b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-
>>> vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_core.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..d84914f615a5
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_core.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>> +/*
>>> + * Copyright (c) 2021 MediaTek Inc.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>> +#include <linux/irq.h>
>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>>> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>>> +
>>> +#include "mtk_vcodec_drv.h"
>>> +#include "mtk_vcodec_enc.h"
>>> +#include "mtk_vcodec_enc_core.h"
>>> +
>>> +static const struct of_device_id mtk_venc_core_ids[] = {
>>> + {
>>> + .compatible = "mediatek,mtk-venc-core0",
>>> + .data = (void *)MTK_VENC_CORE0,
>>> + },
>>> + {
>>> + .compatible = "mediatek,mtk-venc-core1",
>>> + .data = (void *)MTK_VENC_CORE1,
>>> + },
>>> + {},
>>> +};
>>
>> Hello Irui,
>>
>> You don't need a different compatible for the different cores, as in
>> the
>> declaration, there's nothing special that differentiates them that
>> much.
>>
>> I understand that there may be a need to differentiate the core
>> number, as
>> in, CORE0 always has to be the leader, while CORE1 would be the
>> follower,
>> but this is not a good reason to give them a different compatible
>> string.
>>
>> I want to make you aware that Kyrie Wu did the same thing as you did
>> here
>> and in my review on his patch I was able to give an extensive example
>> of
>> how this should look; the exactly same logic would apply to this
>> patch.
>>
>> Please have a look here:
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/comment/24726607/
>>
>> P.S.: In short, you should have only one "mediatek,mtk-venc-hw"
>> compatible
>> used for probing both cores.
>
> thanks for your suggestions, with your example, venc can be rewritten
> like this:
> venc {
> compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-vcodec-enc";
> ..... other properties .....
>
> venc_core0 {
> compatible = "mediatek,mtk-venc-hw";
> mediatek,hw-leader;//mediatek,venc-core0;
> ..... other properties .....
> };
>
> venc_core1 {
> compatible = "mediatek,mtk-venc-hw";
> //mediatek,venc-core1;
> ..... other properties .....
> };
> };
> I will rewrite this code if it matches your suggestions.
Yes, exactly. Just one nit, please don't use underscores.
venc_core0: venc-hw@(addr)
this is fine ^
venc_core0: venc_hw@(addr)
this is NOT ok ^^
By the way, one (or more than one) of the commits in this series
is not working correctly, giving a kernel panic on dma mem alloc.
Looking forward to see the new version!
Regards,
Angelo
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list