[PATCH] i2c: at91: use dma safe buffers

[Wolfram Sang]

Hi Christian,

> Maybe call your variable differently. DMA-buf is an inter driver buffer
> sharing frame we use for GPU acceleration and V4L.
> 
> It doesn't cause any technical issues, but the maintainer regex now triggers
> on that. So you are CCing people not related to this code in any way.

Frankly, I think the 'dma_buf' regex is a bit too generic. 'dma_buf'
seems like a reasonable name to me if some subsystem has to deal with
different buffers which can be DMA or non-DMA, like I2C. If you git-grep
the tree, you will find it in quite some places.

We could now think of renaming the variable to 'dmabuf' but this is
a strange and kind of arbitrary rule to remember IMO.

I wonder if you'd miss a lot of patches if we remove 'dma_buf' from the
regex and keep 'dma_fence' and 'dma_resv'? Or extend it to 'dma_buf_' or
'struct dma_buf'?

All the best,

   Wolfram

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20220304/ed1f41d0/attachment.sig>