[PATCH bpf-next v6 0/4] bpf trampoline for arm64

Daniel Borkmann daniel at iogearbox.net
Thu Jun 30 14:12:54 PDT 2022


Hey Mark,

On 6/25/22 6:12 PM, Xu Kuohai wrote:
> This patchset introduces bpf trampoline on arm64. A bpf trampoline converts
> native calling convention to bpf calling convention and is used to implement
> various bpf features, such as fentry, fexit, fmod_ret and struct_ops.
> 
> The trampoline introduced does essentially the same thing as the bpf
> trampoline does on x86.
> 
> Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu:
> 
>   #18 /1     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK
>   #18 /2     bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK
>   #18 /3     bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK
>   #18 /4     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK
>   #18 /5     bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK
>   #18        bpf_tcp_ca:OK
>   #51 /1     dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK
>   #51 /2     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK
>   #51 /3     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK
>   #51 /4     dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK
>   #51        dummy_st_ops:OK
>   #57 /1     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK
>   #57 /2     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK
>   #57 /3     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK
>   #57 /4     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK
>   #57 /5     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK
>   #57 /6     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK
>   #57 /7     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK
>   #57 /8     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK
>   #57 /9     fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK
>   #57        fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
>   #237       xdp_bpf2bpf:OK
> 
> v6:
> - Since Mark is refactoring arm64 ftrace to support long jump and reduce the
>    ftrace trampoline overhead, it's not clear how we'll attach bpf trampoline
>    to regular kernel functions, so remove ftrace related patches for now.
> - Add long jump support for attaching bpf trampoline to bpf prog, since bpf
>    trampoline and bpf prog are allocated via vmalloc, there is chance the
>    distance exceeds the max branch range.
> - Collect ACK/Review-by, not sure if the ACK and Review-bys for bpf_arch_text_poke()
>    should be kept, since the changes to it is not trivial
> - Update some commit messages and comments

Given you've been taking a look and had objections in v5, would be great if you
can find some cycles for this v6.

Thanks a lot,
Daniel



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list