[PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: exynosautov9: correct clock numbering of peric0/c1

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 27/06/2022 02:52, Chanho Park wrote:
> There are duplicated definitions of peric0 and peric1 cmu blocks. Thus,
> they should be defined correctly as numerical order.
> 
> Fixes: 680e1c8370a2 ("dt-bindings: clock: add clock binding definitions for Exynos Auto v9")
> Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park at samsung.com>
> ---
>  .../dt-bindings/clock/samsung,exynosautov9.h  | 56 +++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,exynosautov9.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,exynosautov9.h
> index ea9f91b4eb1a..a7db6516593f 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,exynosautov9.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,exynosautov9.h
> @@ -226,21 +226,21 @@
>  #define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_IPCLK_8		28
>  #define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_IPCLK_9		29
>  #define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_IPCLK_10	30
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_IPCLK_11	30
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_0		31
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_1		32
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_2		33
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_3		34
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_4		35
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_5		36
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_6		37
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_7		38
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_8		39
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_9		40
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_10		41
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_11		42
> +#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_IPCLK_11	31
> +#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_0		32
> +#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_1		33

Is this a fix for current cycle? If yes, it's ok, otherwise all other
IDs should not be changed, because it's part of ABI.

Best regards,
Krzysztof