[PATCH v2 -next] soc: mediatek: SVS: Use the new PM macros
Matthias Brugger
matthias.bgg at gmail.com
Thu Jun 23 05:03:36 PDT 2022
On 23/06/2022 13:59, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
>
> On 23/06/2022 05:09, Jin Xiaoyun wrote:
>> Use DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() instead of the SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS()
>> macro, along with using pm_sleep_ptr() as this driver doesn't handle
>> runtime PM.
>>
>> Fix build error:
>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c:1515:12: error: ‘svs_resume’ defined but not
>> used [-Werror=unused-function]
>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c:1481:12: error: ‘svs_suspend’ defined but not
>> used [-Werror=unused-function]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jin Xiaoyun <jinxiaoyun2 at huawei.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg at gmail.com>
I never did give my Reviewed-by for that. Please only add these tags if you got
it explicetely.
Regards,
Matthias
>> ---
>> v1->v2:
>> - Remove the #ifdef CONFIG_PM guard around the suspend/resume functions
>> - Use DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS along with using pm_sleep_ptr()
>> ---
>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
>> index 606a00a2e57d..fae7376bd083 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
>> @@ -2381,13 +2381,13 @@ static int svs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(svs_pm_ops, svs_suspend, svs_resume);
>> +static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(svs_pm_ops, svs_suspend, svs_resume);
>>
>> static struct platform_driver svs_driver = {
>> .probe = svs_probe,
>> .driver = {
>> .name = "mtk-svs",
>> - .pm = &svs_pm_ops,
>> + .pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&svs_pm_ops),
>
> Why do we need that? From my understanding DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() sets
> runtime_suspend_fn, runtime_resume_fn and idle_fn to NULL.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
>> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(svs_of_match),
>> },
>> };
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list