[PATCH 1/8] serial: core: only get RS485 termination gpio if supported

Andy Shevchenko andy.shevchenko at gmail.com
Thu Jun 23 02:45:57 PDT 2022


On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 4:00 AM Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo at gmx.de> wrote:
> On 22.06.22 at 19:04, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 05:46:52PM +0200, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> >> From: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo at kunbus.com>
> >>
> >> In uart_get_rs485_mode() only try to get a termination GPIO if RS485 bus
> >> termination is supported by the driver.
> >
> > I'm not sure I got the usefulness of this change.
> > We request GPIO line as optional, so if one is defined it in the DT/ACPI, then
> > they probably want to (opportunistically) have it>
> >
> > With your change it's possible to have a DTS where GPIO line defined in a
> > broken way and user won't ever know about it, if they are using platforms
> > without termination support.
>
> This behavior is not introduced with this patch, also in the current code the driver
> wont inform the user if it does not make use erroneous defined termination GPIO.

It does. If a previously stale GPIO resource may have deferred a probe
and hence one may debug why the driver is not working, after this
change one may put a stale GPIO resource into DT/ACPI and have nothing
in the result. Meaning the change relaxes validation which I consider
is not good.

> This patch at least prevents the driver from allocating and holding a GPIO descriptor across
> the drivers lifetime that will never be used.

But it's not your issue, if DTS defines it, so the platform has an
idea about its usage.

> Furthermore it simplifies the code in patch 2 when we want to set the GPIO, since we can
> skip the check whether or not the termination GPIO is supported by the driver.

That's fine.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list