[PATCH v6 32/33] arm64: irq-gic: Replace unreachable() with -EINVAL

[Marc Zyngier]

On 2022-06-23 02:49, Chen Zhongjin wrote:
> Using unreachable() at default of switch generates an extra branch at
> end of the function, and compiler won't generate a ret to close this
> branch because it knows it's unreachable.
> 
> If there's no instruction in this branch, compiler will generate a NOP,
> And it will confuse objtool to warn this NOP as a fall through branch.
> 
> In fact these branches are actually unreachable, so we can replace
> unreachable() with returning a -EINVAL value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin at huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c | 7 +++----
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c    | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Basic courtesy would have been to Cc the maintainers of this code.

> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c 
> b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> index 4fb419f7b8b6..f3cee92c3038 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
> 
>  #include <hyp/adjust_pc.h>
> 
> -#include <linux/compiler.h>
>  #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
>  #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> 
> @@ -55,7 +54,7 @@ static u64 __gic_v3_get_lr(unsigned int lr)
>  		return read_gicreg(ICH_LR15_EL2);
>  	}
> 
> -	unreachable();
> +	return -EINVAL;

NAK. That's absolutely *wrong*, and will hide future bugs.
Nothing checks for -EINVAL, and we *never* expect to
reach this, hence the perfectly valid annotation.

If something needs fixing, it probably is your tooling.

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...