[PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-sk: Add pinmux for RPi Header
Jason Kridner
jkridner at gmail.com
Sat Jun 18 05:11:07 PDT 2022
For those seeing this message multiple times, my apologies for not
properly setting up my mailer.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 10:16 PM Nishanth Menon <nm at ti.com> wrote:
>
> On 15:40-20220530, Rahul T R wrote:
> > From: Sinthu Raja <sinthu.raja at ti.com>
> >
> > Add pinmux required to bring out
> > i2c5, ehrpwm 2 and 3 and gpios on
> > 40 pin RPi header on sk board
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sinthu Raja <sinthu.raja at ti.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rahul T R <r-ravikumar at ti.com>
>
>
> I was digging deeper at https://www.ti.com/lit/zip/sprr438
> (PROC112E2(001)_SCH.pdf - J3, Also looking at
> https://github.com/beagleboard/beaglebone-ai-64/blob/master/BeagleBone%20AI%20-64_SCH_V1.02_211119.pdf
> (P8, P9)
>
> And comparing it to https://www.raspberrypi-spy.co.uk/2012/06/simple-guide-to-the-rpi-gpio-header-and-pins/
> And considering potential use such as https://pypi.org/project/RPi.GPIO/
> variation,
>
> Here is my suggestion (applies to other TI Boards that attempt to
> emulate RPI header)
> a) Default mux in board.dts should be GPIO except for the i2c used for
> ID detection.
> b) Secondary functions should be a dt overlay. (These can easily enable
> the pwms and other functions as needed)
> c) Maintain node names consistent to allow reuse of overlays across
> platforms.
>
> Usage: you can either use extlinux.conf OR uEnv.txt to apply the
> overlays as desired (ID detection from hats might help automate it based
> on the bootloader you'd want to use)
>
> Else, you have created a custom configuration here for 1 specific
> application, various hats that expect GPIO will end up croaking.
>
>
> I am open to discussions here.
A read of our recent blog series done with Bootlin is worth a read on
this topic. https://bbb.io/@2804
My suggestion is to put the entries for the common functions in the
base tree, but not enable them (except for the I2C used for ID
detection, as you suggested). This can remove SoC-specific
requirements on the overlays such that the overlays are written
against a header specification as defined by the common symbols
provided. So, make the entries in the base tree and leave them
"disabled" such that overlays only need to set the symbol to "okay",
at least for the common stuff to all implementations of the Pi header.
>
>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-sk.dts | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-sk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-sk.dts
> > index 98a55778f3fe..b913b18ae133 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-sk.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-sk.dts
> > @@ -400,6 +400,57 @@
> > J721E_IOPAD(0x124, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (Y24) PRG0_PRU1_GPO9.GPIO0_72 */
> > >;
> > };
> > +
> > + main_i2c5_pins_default: main-i2c5-pins-default {
> > + pinctrl-single,pins = <
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x150, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP, 2) /* (Y26) PRG0_MDIO0_MDIO.I2C5_SCL */
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x154, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP, 2) /* (AA27) PRG0_MDIO0_MDC.I2C5_SDA */
> > + >;
> > + };
> > +
> > + rpi_header_gpio0_pins_default: rpi-header-gpio0-pins-default {
> > + pinctrl-single,pins = <
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x01c, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (AD22) PRG1_PRU0_GPO6.GPIO0_7 */
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x120, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (AA28) PRG0_PRU1_GPO8.GPIO0_71 */
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x14c, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (AA29) PRG0_PRU1_GPO19.GPIO0_82 */
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x02c, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (AD21) PRG1_PRU0_GPO10.GPIO0_11 */
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x198, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (V25) RGMII6_TD1.GPIO0_101 */
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x1b0, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (W24) RGMII6_RD1.GPIO0_107 */
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x1a0, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (W29) RGMII6_TXC.GPIO0_103 */
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x008, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (AG22) PRG1_PRU0_GPO1.GPIO0_2 */
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x1d0, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (AA3) SPI0_D1.GPIO0_115 */
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x11c, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (AA24) PRG0_PRU1_GPO7.GPIO0_70 */
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x148, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (AA26) PRG0_PRU1_GPO18.GPIO0_81 */
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x004, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (AC23) PRG1_PRU0_GPO0.GPIO0_1 */
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x014, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (AH23) PRG1_PRU0_GPO4.GPIO0_5 */
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x020, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (AE20) PRG1_PRU0_GPO7.GPIO0_8 */
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x19c, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (W27) RGMII6_TD0.GPIO0_102 */
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x1b4, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (W25) RGMII6_RD0.GPIO0_108 */
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x188, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (Y28) RGMII6_TX_CTL.GPIO0_97 */
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x00c, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (AF22) PRG1_PRU0_GPO2.GPIO0_3 */
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x010, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (AJ23) PRG1_PRU0_GPO3.GPIO0_4 */
> > + >;
> > + };
> > +
> > + rpi_header_gpio1_pins_default: rpi-header-gpio1-pins-default {
> > + pinctrl-single,pins = <
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x234, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (U3) EXT_REFCLK1.GPIO1_12 */
> > + >;
> > + };
> > +
> > + rpi_header_ehrpwm2_pins_default: rpi-header-ehrpwm2-pins-default {
> > + pinctrl-single,pins = <
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x178, PIN_INPUT, 6) /* (U27) RGMII5_RD3.EHRPWM2_A */
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x17c, PIN_INPUT, 6) /* (U24) RGMII5_RD2.EHRPWM2_B */
> > + >;
> > + };
> > +
> > + rpi_header_ehrpwm3_pins_default: rpi-header-ehrpwm3-pins-default {
> > + pinctrl-single,pins = <
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x18c, PIN_INPUT, 6) /* (V23) RGMII6_RX_CTL.EHRPWM3_A */
> > + J721E_IOPAD(0x190, PIN_INPUT, 6) /* (W23) RGMII6_TD3.EHRPWM3_B */
> > + >;
> > + };
> > };
> >
> > &wkup_pmx0 {
> > @@ -631,11 +682,6 @@
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> >
> > -&main_i2c5 {
> > - /* Brought out on RPi Header */
> > - status = "disabled";
> > -};
> > -
>
> Please don't relocate nodes in the same patch - kinda messes up the
> diffstat and makes review a bit harder.
>
> > &main_i2c6 {
> > /* Unused */
> > status = "disabled";
> > @@ -1138,18 +1184,39 @@
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> >
> > -&main_ehrpwm2 {
> > +&main_ehrpwm4 {
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> >
> > -&main_ehrpwm3 {
> > +&main_ehrpwm5 {
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> >
> > -&main_ehrpwm4 {
> > - status = "disabled";
> > +&main_gpio0 {
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&rpi_header_gpio0_pins_default>;
> > };
> >
> > -&main_ehrpwm5 {
> > - status = "disabled";
> > +&main_gpio1 {
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&rpi_header_gpio1_pins_default>;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&main_i2c5 {
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&main_i2c5_pins_default>;
> > + clock-frequency = <400000>;
> > + status = "okay";
>
> Defaults in SoC.dtsi so far are "okay" - so adding that again is
> superfluous This happens when you are relocating nodes etc
>
> > +};
> > +
> > +&main_ehrpwm2 {
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&rpi_header_ehrpwm2_pins_default>;
> > + status = "okay";
> > +};
> > +
> > +&main_ehrpwm3 {
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&rpi_header_ehrpwm3_pins_default>;
> > + status = "okay";
> > };
>
> --
> Regards,
> Nishanth Menon
> Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
--
https://beagleboard.org/about/jkridner - a 501c3 non-profit educating
around open hardware computing
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list