[PATCH] dt-bindings: rcc: stm32: select the "secure" path for stm32mp13

Alexandre TORGUE alexandre.torgue at foss.st.com
Fri Jun 17 00:21:40 PDT 2022


Hi Rob

On 6/16/22 19:55, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 11:38:15AM +0200, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>> Like for stm32mp15, when stm32 RCC node is used to interact with a secure
> 
> 'st,stm32mp1' is stm32mp15?

Yes "st,stm32mp1-rcc" is for the STM32MP15.

> 
>> context (using clock SCMI protocol), a different path has to be used for
>> yaml verification.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue at foss.st.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Hi Rob, Krzysztof,
>>
>> If you agree with this patch, I'll apply it directly in my STM32 tree.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Alex
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.yaml
>> index f8c474227807..242fe922b035 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.yaml
>> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ if:
>>         contains:
>>           enum:
>>             - st,stm32mp1-rcc-secure
>> +          - st,stm32mp13-rcc
> 
> You don't need '-secure' because it's always secure?

Yes. Compare to STM32MP15, the STM32MP13 is by default "secure". In our 
case it is "mapped" to OPTEE, using SCMI protocols.

regards
Alex

> 
>>   then:
>>     properties:
>>       clocks:
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>
>>




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list