[PATCH] drm/mediatek: fix crtc index computation
CK Hu
ck.hu at mediatek.com
Thu Jun 16 22:23:21 PDT 2022
Hi, Fabien:
On Mon, 2022-05-30 at 16:24 +0200, Fabien Parent wrote:
> The code always assume that the main path is enabled, which is not
> always the case. When the main path is not enabled, the CRTC index
> of the ext path is incorrect which makes the secondary path
> not usable. Fix the CRTC index calculation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabien Parent <fparent at baylibre.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c | 46 +++++++++++++++--
> ----
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> index 5d7504a72b11..6f2abfc608fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> @@ -430,25 +430,47 @@ int mtk_ddp_comp_get_id(struct device_node
> *node,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +static bool mtk_drm_comp_is_enabled(struct drm_device *drm,
> + const enum mtk_ddp_comp_id *path,
> + unsigned int path_len)
> +{
> + struct mtk_drm_private *priv = drm->dev_private;
> +
> + return path && path_len && !!priv->comp_node[path[path_len -
> 1]];
Why just check priv->comp_node[path[path_len - 1]]?
In mtk_drm_crtc_create(), crtc would not be created if any comp node in
the path is null.
Regards,
CK
> +}
> +
> unsigned int mtk_drm_find_possible_crtc_by_comp(struct drm_device
> *drm,
> struct device *dev)
> {
> struct mtk_drm_private *private = drm->dev_private;
> - unsigned int ret = 0;
> + unsigned int index = 0;
>
> - if (mtk_drm_find_comp_in_ddp(dev, private->data->main_path,
> private->data->main_len,
> + if (mtk_drm_find_comp_in_ddp(dev, private->data->main_path,
> + private->data->main_len,
> private->ddp_comp))
> - ret = BIT(0);
> - else if (mtk_drm_find_comp_in_ddp(dev, private->data->ext_path,
> - private->data->ext_len,
> private->ddp_comp))
> - ret = BIT(1);
> - else if (mtk_drm_find_comp_in_ddp(dev, private->data-
> >third_path,
> - private->data->third_len,
> private->ddp_comp))
> - ret = BIT(2);
> - else
> - DRM_INFO("Failed to find comp in ddp table\n");
> + return BIT(index);
> +
> + if (mtk_drm_comp_is_enabled(drm, private->data->main_path,
> + private->data->main_len))
> + index++;
>
> - return ret;
> + if (mtk_drm_find_comp_in_ddp(dev, private->data->ext_path,
> + private->data->ext_len,
> + private->ddp_comp))
> + return BIT(index);
> +
> + if (mtk_drm_comp_is_enabled(drm, private->data->ext_path,
> + private->data->ext_len))
> + index++;
> +
> + if (mtk_drm_find_comp_in_ddp(dev, private->data->third_path,
> + private->data->third_len,
> + private->ddp_comp))
> + return BIT(index);
> +
> + DRM_INFO("Failed to find comp in ddp table\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> int mtk_ddp_comp_init(struct device_node *node, struct mtk_ddp_comp
> *comp,
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list