[PATCH v2 12/20] dt-bindings: reset: npcm: Add support for NPCM8XX

[Tomer Maimon]

Hi Krzysztof,

On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 at 16:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 16/06/2022 06:24, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 at 20:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 13/06/2022 02:25, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> >>> Hi Krzysztof,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for your clarification.
> >>>
> >>> We can remove the dt-binding file and use numbers in the DTS,
> >>> appreciate if you can answer few additional questions:
> >>> 1. Do you suggest adding all NPCM reset values to the NPCM reset
> >>> document or the reset values should describe in the module
> >>> documentation that uses it?
> >>
> >> What is "NPCM reset document"? Are these reset values anyhow different
> >> than interrupts or pins?
> > No, they represent the same values.
>
>
> We do not document in the bindings actual pin or interrupt numbers...
>
> >>
> >>> 2. Some of the NPCM7XX document modules describe the reset value they
> >>> use from the dt-binding for example:
> >>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/nuvoton%2Cnpcm750-adc.yaml#L61
> >>
> >> This is NPCM750
> >>
> >>> If we remove the NPCM8XX dt-binding file should we describe the
> >>> NPCM8XX values in the NPCM-ADC document file?
> >>
> >> What is NPCM-ADC document file? What do you want to describe there?
> >> Again - how is it different than interrupts?
> > It is not different from the interrupts.
> > I will remove the dt-binding reset include file, the reset property
> > will use numbers and not macro's.
>
> I have no clue what are you referring now... This is NPCM8xx and it has
> no binding header with reset values. What to remove then?
I refer nuvoton,npcm8xx-reset.h file, we don't need it.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof