[PATCH v11 05/10] drm/mediatek: Add MT8195 Embedded DisplayPort driver
CK Hu
ck.hu at mediatek.com
Tue Jun 14 23:33:55 PDT 2022
Hi, Bo-Chen:
On Wed, 2022-06-15 at 13:50 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, Bo-Chen:
>
> On Fri, 2022-06-10 at 18:55 +0800, Bo-Chen Chen wrote:
> > From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp at baylibre.com>
> >
> > This patch adds a embedded displayport driver for the MediaTek
> > mt8195
> > SoC.
> >
> > It supports the MT8195, the embedded DisplayPort units. It offers
> > DisplayPort 1.4 with up to 4 lanes.
> >
> > The driver creates a child device for the phy. The child device
> > will
> > never exist without the parent being active. As they are sharing a
> > register range, the parent passes a regmap pointer to the child so
> > that
> > both can work with the same register range. The phy driver sets
> > device
> > data that is read by the parent to get the phy device that can be
> > used
> > to control the phy properties.
> >
> > This driver is based on an initial version by
> > Jitao shi <jitao.shi at mediatek.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp at baylibre.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet at baylibre.com>
> > [Bo-Chen: Cleanup the drivers and modify comments from reviewers]
> > Signed-off-by: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen at mediatek.com>
> > ---
>
> [snip]
>
> > +
> > +static int mtk_dp_train_flow(struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp, u8
> > target_link_rate,
> > + u8 target_lane_count)
> > +{
> > + u8 lane_adjust[2] = {};
> > + bool pass_tps1 = false;
> > + bool pass_tps2_3 = false;
> > + int train_retries;
> > + int status_control;
> > + int iteration_count;
> > + int ret;
> > + u8 prev_lane_adjust;
> > +
> > + drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&mtk_dp->aux, DP_LINK_BW_SET,
> > target_link_rate);
> > + drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&mtk_dp->aux, DP_LANE_COUNT_SET,
> > + target_lane_count |
> > DP_LANE_COUNT_ENHANCED_FRAME_EN);
> > +
> > + if (mtk_dp->train_info.sink_ssc)
> > + drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&mtk_dp->aux, DP_DOWNSPREAD_CTRL,
> > + DP_SPREAD_AMP_0_5);
> > +
> > + train_retries = 0;
> > + status_control = 0;
> > + iteration_count = 1;
> > + prev_lane_adjust = 0xFF;
> > +
> > + mtk_dp_set_lanes(mtk_dp, target_lane_count / 2);
> > + ret = mtk_dp_phy_configure(mtk_dp, target_link_rate,
> > target_lane_count);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(mtk_dp->dev,
> > + "Link train target_link_rate = 0x%x, target_lane_count
> > = 0x%x\n",
> > + target_link_rate, target_lane_count);
> > +
> > + do {
> > + train_retries++;
> > + if (!mtk_dp->train_info.cable_plugged_in ||
> > + mtk_dp->train_info.irq_sta.hpd_disconnect) {
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (mtk_dp->train_state < MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_TRAINING)
>
> This checking would never be true, so remove it.
>
> > + return -EAGAIN;
> > +
> > + if (!pass_tps1) {
> > + ret = mtk_dp_train_tps_1(mtk_dp,
> > target_lane_count,
> > + &iteration_count,
> > lane_adjust,
> > + &status_control,
> > + &prev_lane_adjust);
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + pass_tps1 = true;
> > + train_retries = 0;
> > + } else if (ret == -EINVAL) {
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + ret = mtk_dp_train_tps_2_3(mtk_dp,
> > target_link_rate,
> > + target_lane_count,
> > + &iteration_count,
> > + lane_adjust,
> > &status_control,
> > + &prev_lane_adjust);
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + pass_tps2_3 = true;
> > + break;
> > + } else if (ret == -EINVAL) {
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + drm_dp_dpcd_read(&mtk_dp->aux,
> > DP_ADJUST_REQUEST_LANE0_1,
> > + lane_adjust, sizeof(lane_adjust));
> > + mtk_dp_train_update_swing_pre(mtk_dp,
> > target_lane_count,
> > + lane_adjust);
> > + } while (train_retries < MTK_DP_TRAIN_RETRY_LIMIT &&
> > + iteration_count < MTK_DP_TRAIN_MAX_ITERATIONS);
>
> mtk_dp_train_tps_1() & mtk_dp_train_tps_2_3() would only be called
> once
> and never be called twice, so remove this loop.
Sorry, mtk_dp_train_tps_1() & mtk_dp_train_tps_2_3() may return
-EAGAIN, so keep this loop.
>
> Regards,
> CK
>
> > +
> > + drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&mtk_dp->aux, DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_SET,
> > + DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_DISABLE);
> > + ret = mtk_dp_train_set_pattern(mtk_dp, 0);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (!pass_tps2_3)
> > + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > +
> > + mtk_dp->train_info.link_rate = target_link_rate;
> > + mtk_dp->train_info.lane_count = target_lane_count;
> > +
> > + mtk_dp_training_set_scramble(mtk_dp, true);
> > +
> > + drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&mtk_dp->aux, DP_LANE_COUNT_SET,
> > + target_lane_count |
> > + DP_LANE_COUNT_ENHANCED_FRAME_EN);
> > + mtk_dp_set_enhanced_frame_mode(mtk_dp, true);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list