[PATCH v9 7/8] PCI: imx6: Move the phy driver callbacks to the proper places

Bjorn Helgaas helgaas at kernel.org
Thu Jun 9 09:25:52 PDT 2022


On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 06:20:16AM +0000, Hongxing Zhu wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas at kernel.org>
> > Sent: 2022年6月9日 2:58
> > To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu at nxp.com>
> > Cc: l.stach at pengutronix.de; bhelgaas at google.com; robh+dt at kernel.org;
> > broonie at kernel.org; lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com; jingoohan1 at gmail.com;
> > festevam at gmail.com; francesco.dolcini at toradex.com;
> > linux-pci at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org;
> > linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; kernel at pengutronix.de; dl-linux-imx
> > <linux-imx at nxp.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 7/8] PCI: imx6: Move the phy driver callbacks to the
> > proper places
> > 
> > On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 09:47:08AM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
> > > To make it more reasonable, move the phy_power_on/phy_init callbacks
> > > to the proper places.
> > > - move the phy_power_on() out of imx6_pcie_clk_enable().
> > > - move the phy_init() out of imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset().
> > 
> > I'm not sure what "make it more reasonable" is telling me.  In
> > subject line and commit log, please say something more specific
> > than "the proper places."
> > 
> > It's probably more important to say where they are moving *to*
> > than where they're moving *out of*.

> Thanks for your comments.
> In another review loop listed below, Lucas used said that it's not
> good to hide PHY init in imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset() So, I make a
> try to move the phy_init() out of imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset().
> And move phy_power_on() out of imx6_pcie_clk_enable() accordingly.
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/1646289275-17813-1-git-send-email-hongxing.zhu@nxp.com/
> Okay, I would specific that they are moving *to* later.
> 
> > > In order to save power consumption, turn off the clocks and
> > > regulators when the imx6_pcie_host_init() return error.
> > 
> > Is the power savings the *reason* for this change?  I can't tell
> > from the commit log.
>
> The error handling of the imx6_pcie_host_init() is not mentioned in
> the subject.  Should I split these changes into two patches?

If they can be split, they probably should be split.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list