[PATCH] random: do not use jump labels before they are initialized

Ard Biesheuvel ardb at kernel.org
Tue Jun 7 05:03:28 PDT 2022


On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 13:35, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason at zx2c4.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ard,
>
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 01:10:52PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > Fair enough. What I would like is to remove the need to play around
> > with the placement of jump_label_init() across architectures. Jump
> > labels are fundamentally a performance optimization, so unless you can
> > explain how setting it as early as possible makes a material
> > difference, performance or otherwise, I really think we should pursue
> > a solution that does the static key manipulation at some later time.
>
> Alright. It sounds like Catalin also prefers the same. This seems simple
> enough with minimal downsides: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220607113238.769088-1-Jason@zx2c4.com/
>

That looks simple enough. Do we risk causing any boot stalls due to
the crediting being deferred? Or new warnings about randomness being
used before CRNG is ready?

> So maybe we should just go that route.
>

It is not my preferred approach, but I can live with it.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list