[PATCH v4 2/6] mm: ioremap: Use more sensibly name in ioremap_prot()

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 03:48:11PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> Use more meaningful and sensibly naming phys_addr
> instead addr in ioremap_prot().
> 
> Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org>
> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang at huawei.com>
> ---
>  include/asm-generic/io.h |  2 +-
>  mm/ioremap.c             | 12 ++++++------
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/io.h b/include/asm-generic/io.h
> index 7ce93aaf69f8..e6ffa2519f08 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/io.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/io.h
> @@ -964,7 +964,7 @@ static inline void iounmap(volatile void __iomem *addr)
>  #elif defined(CONFIG_GENERIC_IOREMAP)
>  #include <linux/pgtable.h>
>  
> -void __iomem *ioremap_prot(phys_addr_t addr, size_t size, unsigned long prot);
> +void __iomem *ioremap_prot(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size, unsigned long prot);

This adds an overly long line now.

> -void __iomem *ioremap_prot(phys_addr_t addr, size_t size, unsigned long prot)
> +void __iomem *ioremap_prot(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size, unsigned long prot)

Same here.