[Openipmi-developer] [PATCH v7 1/3] ipmi: ssif_bmc: Add SSIF BMC driver
Quan Nguyen
quan at os.amperecomputing.com
Wed Jun 1 01:23:11 PDT 2022
On 04/05/2022 19:06, Corey Minyard wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 01:45:03PM +0700, Quan Nguyen via Openipmi-developer wrote:
>>>
>>> I seem to remember mentioning this before, but there is no reason to
>>> pack the structures below.
>>>
>>
>> The packed structure is because we want to pick the len directly from user
>> space without worry about the padding byte.
>>
>> As we plan not to use the .h file in next version, I still would like to use
>> packed structure internally inside ssif_bmc.c file.
>
> Packed doesn't matter for the userspace API. If you look at other
> structures in the userspace API, they are not packed, either. The
> compiler will do the right thing on both ends.
>
>>
>>> And second, the following is a userspace API structures, so it needs to
>>> be in its own file in include/uapi/linux, along with any supporting
>>> things that users will need to use. And your userspace code should be
>>> using that file.
>>>
>>
>> Meantime, I'd like not to use .h as I see there is no demand for sharing the
>> data structure between kernel and user space yet. But we may do it in the
>> future.
>
> If you have a userspace API, it needs to be in include/uapi/linux.
> You may not be the only user of this code. In fact, you probably won't
> be. You need to have a .h with the structures in it, you don't want the
> same structure in two places if you can help it.
>
Dear Corey,
Is it OK to push the structure definition into the
include/uapi/linux/ipmi_bmc.h ?
Or should it need to be in separate new header file in uapi/linux ?
Thank you,
- Quan
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list