[RESEND PATCH 1/8] ARM: debug: bcmbca: Replace ARCH_BCM_63XX with ARCH_BCMBCA

Florian Fainelli f.fainelli at gmail.com
Wed Jul 13 09:10:43 PDT 2022


On 7/13/22 08:39, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 7.07.2022 08:57, William Zhang wrote:
>> Prepare for the BCM63138 ARCH_BCM_63XX migration to ARCH_BCMBCA. Make
>> DEBUG_BCM63XX_UART depending on ARCH_BCMBCA.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: William Zhang <william.zhang at broadcom.com>
>> ---
>>
>>   arch/arm/Kconfig.debug | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
>> index 9b0aa4822d69..792796a348c3 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
>> @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ choice
>>       config DEBUG_BCM63XX_UART
>>           bool "Kernel low-level debugging on BCM63XX UART"
>> -        depends on ARCH_BCM_63XX
>> +        depends on ARCH_BCMBCA
>>       config DEBUG_BERLIN_UART
>>           bool "Marvell Berlin SoC Debug UART"
> 
> There is no such config symbol (ARCH_BCMBCA) in Linus's tree.
> 
> This patchset is going to break builds until code it depends on hits 
> Linus's tree.
> 
> All those patches should be hold until that.

There is, ARCH_BCMBCA was added to arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig with 
b32c613b3fda3 ("arm: bcmbca: add arch bcmbca machine entry") which is in 
v5.19-rc1 and newer:

  git tag --contains b32c613b3fda3
arm-soc/for-5.19/devicetree-arm64-fixes
arm-soc/for-5.19/devicetree-fixes
arm-soc/for-5.19/drivers-fixes
arm-soc/for-5.19/maintainers-fixes
arm-soc/for-5.19/soc
arm-soc/for-5.20/defconfig
arm-soc/for-5.20/defconfig-arm64
arm-soc/for-5.20/devicetree
arm-soc/for-5.20/devicetree-arm64
arm-soc/for-5.20/drivers
arm-soc/for-5.20/maintainers
arm-soc/for-5.20/soc
ib-mfd-soc-bcm-v5.20
mips-fixes_5.19_1
mips-fixes_5.19_2
next-20220511
next-20220512
next-20220523
next-20220524
next-20220610
next-20220627
next-20220628
next-20220706
next-20220708
next-20220711
next-20220712
v5.19-rc1
v5.19-rc2
v5.19-rc3
v5.19-rc4
v5.19-rc5
v5.19-rc6

otherwise we would not have done it that way. Am I missing something?
-- 
Florian



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list