[PATCH 5/5] arm64: rework BTI exception handling

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 05:14:52PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> If a BTI exception is taken from EL1, the entry code will treat this as
> an unhandled exception and will panic() the kernel. This is inconsistent
> with the way we handle FPAC exceptions, which have a dedicated handler
> and only necessarily kill the thread from which the exception was taken
> from, and we don't log all the information that could be relevant to
> debug the issue.

Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20220712/f96efd63/attachment.sig>