[PATCH v1 2/3] dt-binding: power: power-domain: add power-supply-needs-irq

Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org
Mon Jul 11 03:38:28 PDT 2022


On 11/07/2022 11:45, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> Add the power-supply-needs-irq board description property for power domains.

Where is a board description here? I think you just meant
"power-supply-needs-irq property"?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger at puri.sm>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml        | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
> index 889091b9814f..e82c2f7ccb97 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
> @@ -70,6 +70,16 @@ properties:
>        by the given provider should be subdomains of the domain specified
>        by this binding.
>  
> +  power-supply: true

This is a new property not described in the commit msg.

> +
> +  power-supply-needs-irq:
> +    type: boolean
> +    description:
> +      A power-supply can link for example to a regulator controlled via
> +      i2c or otherwise needing interrupts enabled to be able to enable and
> +      disable. 

Not really a property of power domain. How the regulator supply works is
entirely up to regulator. Otherwise such property should appear for
every device.

> This property makes various callbacks usually run in the
> +      noirq phase, being run when interrupts are available.

Last sentence does not fit - you embed Linux implementation into DT
bindings. noirq phase is Linux specific.

> +
>  required:
>    - "#power-domain-cells"
>  


Best regards,
Krzysztof



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list