[PATCH] dmaengine: sun4i: Set the maximum segment size
Vinod Koul
vkoul at kernel.org
Fri Jul 1 09:28:43 PDT 2022
On 20-06-22, 22:13, Samuel Holland wrote:
> The sun4i DMA engine supports transfer sizes up to 128k for normal DMA
> and 16M for dedicated DMA, as documented in the A10 and A20 manuals.
>
> Since this is larger than the default segment size limit (64k), exposing
> the real limit reduces the number of transfers needed for a transaction.
> However, because the device can only report one segment size limit, we
> have to expose the smaller limit from normal DMA.
>
> One complication is that the driver combines pairs of periodic transfers
> to reduce programming overhead. This only works when the period size is
> at most half of the maximum transfer size. With the default 64k segment
> size limit, this was always the case, but for normal DMA it is no longer
> guaranteed. Skip the optimization if the period is too long; even
> without it, the overhead is less than before.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel at sholland.org>
> ---
> I don't have any A10 or A20 boards I can test this on.
>
> drivers/dma/sun4i-dma.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/sun4i-dma.c b/drivers/dma/sun4i-dma.c
> index 93f1645ae928..f291b1b4db32 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/sun4i-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/sun4i-dma.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> #include <linux/bitmap.h>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
> #include <linux/dmapool.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> @@ -122,6 +123,15 @@
> SUN4I_DDMA_PARA_DST_WAIT_CYCLES(2) | \
> SUN4I_DDMA_PARA_SRC_WAIT_CYCLES(2))
>
> +/*
> + * Normal DMA supports individual transfers (segments) up to 128k.
> + * Dedicated DMA supports transfers up to 16M. We can only report
> + * one size limit, so we have to use the smaller value.
> + */
> +#define SUN4I_NDMA_MAX_SEG_SIZE SZ_128K
> +#define SUN4I_DDMA_MAX_SEG_SIZE SZ_16M
This new define is not used, so why add?
> +#define SUN4I_DMA_MAX_SEG_SIZE SUN4I_NDMA_MAX_SEG_SIZE
> +
> struct sun4i_dma_pchan {
> /* Register base of channel */
> void __iomem *base;
> @@ -155,7 +165,8 @@ struct sun4i_dma_contract {
> struct virt_dma_desc vd;
> struct list_head demands;
> struct list_head completed_demands;
> - int is_cyclic;
> + bool is_cyclic : 1;
> + bool use_half_int : 1;
> };
>
> struct sun4i_dma_dev {
> @@ -372,7 +383,7 @@ static int __execute_vchan_pending(struct sun4i_dma_dev *priv,
> if (promise) {
> vchan->contract = contract;
> vchan->pchan = pchan;
> - set_pchan_interrupt(priv, pchan, contract->is_cyclic, 1);
> + set_pchan_interrupt(priv, pchan, contract->use_half_int, 1);
not interrupt when cyclic?
> configure_pchan(pchan, promise);
> }
>
> @@ -735,12 +746,21 @@ sun4i_dma_prep_dma_cyclic(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t buf, size_t len,
> *
> * Which requires half the engine programming for the same
> * functionality.
> + *
> + * This only works if two periods fit in a single promise. That will
> + * always be the case for dedicated DMA, where the hardware has a much
> + * larger maximum transfer size than advertised to clients.
> */
> - nr_periods = DIV_ROUND_UP(len / period_len, 2);
> + if (vchan->is_dedicated || period_len <= SUN4I_NDMA_MAX_SEG_SIZE / 2) {
> + period_len *= 2;
> + contract->use_half_int = 1;
> + }
> +
> + nr_periods = DIV_ROUND_UP(len, period_len);
> for (i = 0; i < nr_periods; i++) {
> /* Calculate the offset in the buffer and the length needed */
> - offset = i * period_len * 2;
> - plength = min((len - offset), (period_len * 2));
> + offset = i * period_len;
> + plength = min((len - offset), period_len);
> if (dir == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV)
> src = buf + offset;
> else
> @@ -1149,6 +1169,8 @@ static int sun4i_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
> spin_lock_init(&priv->lock);
>
> + dma_set_max_seg_size(&pdev->dev, SUN4I_DMA_MAX_SEG_SIZE);
> +
> dma_cap_zero(priv->slave.cap_mask);
> dma_cap_set(DMA_PRIVATE, priv->slave.cap_mask);
> dma_cap_set(DMA_MEMCPY, priv->slave.cap_mask);
> --
> 2.35.1
--
~Vinod
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list