[PATCH 17/27] dt-bindings: display: rockchip: Add binding for VOP2

[Rob Herring]

On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 15:55:39 +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> The VOP2 is found on newer Rockchip SoCs like the rk3568 or the rk3566.
> The binding differs slightly from the existing VOP binding, so add a new
> binding file for it.
> 
> Changes since v3:
> - drop redundant _vop suffix from clock names
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  .../display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml       | 146 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 146 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml
> 

My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):

yamllint warnings/errors:

dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.example.dt.yaml: vop at fe040000: clock-names:0: 'aclk' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.example.dt.yaml: vop at fe040000: clock-names:1: 'hclk' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml

doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):

See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1584511

This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
series is generally the most recent rc1.

If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
date:

pip3 install dtschema --upgrade

Please check and re-submit.