[PATCH v1 2/2] kselftest/arm64: Correct logging of FPSIMD register read via ptrace

[Shuah Khan]

On 1/24/22 10:55 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> There's a cut'n'paste error in the logging for our test for reading register
> state back via ptrace, correctly say that we did a read instead of a write.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c
> index 0cf78360c5bc..a3c1e67441f9 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c
> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static void ptrace_sve_fpsimd(pid_t child, const struct vec_type *type)
>   	}
>   
>   	ksft_test_result((sve->flags & SVE_PT_REGS_MASK) == SVE_PT_REGS_FPSIMD,
> -			 "Set FPSIMD registers via %s\n", type->name);
> +			 "Got FPSIMD registers via %s\n", type->name);
>   	if ((sve->flags & SVE_PT_REGS_MASK) != SVE_PT_REGS_FPSIMD)
>   		goto out;
>   
> 

Looks good to me. Assuming this is going through ARM tree

Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan at linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah