[RFC PATCH v4 02/26] KVM: arm64: Save ID registers' sanitized value per guest

Fuad Tabba tabba at google.com
Mon Jan 24 08:21:32 PST 2022


Hi Reiji,

On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 4:28 AM Reiji Watanabe <reijiw at google.com> wrote:
>
> Introduce id_regs[] in kvm_arch as a storage of guest's ID registers,
> and save ID registers' sanitized value in the array at KVM_CREATE_VM.
> Use the saved ones when ID registers are read by the guest or
> userspace (via KVM_GET_ONE_REG).
>
> Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw at google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 16 ++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c         | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 2a5f7f38006f..c789a0137f58 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -102,6 +102,17 @@ struct kvm_s2_mmu {
>  struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
>  };
>
> +/*
> + * (Op0, Op1, CRn, CRm, Op2) of ID registers is (3, 0, 0, crm, op2),
> + * where 0<=crm<8, 0<=op2<8.
> + */
> +#define KVM_ARM_ID_REG_MAX_NUM 64
> +#define IDREG_IDX(id)          ((sys_reg_CRm(id) << 3) | sys_reg_Op2(id))
> +#define is_id_reg(id)  \
> +       (sys_reg_Op0(id) == 3 && sys_reg_Op1(id) == 0 &&        \
> +        sys_reg_CRn(id) == 0 && sys_reg_CRm(id) >= 0 &&        \
> +        sys_reg_CRm(id) < 8)
> +

This is consistent with the Arm ARM "Table D12-2 System instruction
encodings for non-Debug System register accesses".

Minor nit, would it be better to have IDREG_IDX and is_id_reg in
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h, since other similar and related ones are
there?

>  struct kvm_arch {
>         struct kvm_s2_mmu mmu;
>
> @@ -137,6 +148,9 @@ struct kvm_arch {
>
>         /* Memory Tagging Extension enabled for the guest */
>         bool mte_enabled;
> +
> +       /* ID registers for the guest. */
> +       u64 id_regs[KVM_ARM_ID_REG_MAX_NUM];
>  };
>
>  struct kvm_vcpu_fault_info {
> @@ -734,6 +748,8 @@ int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  long kvm_vm_ioctl_mte_copy_tags(struct kvm *kvm,
>                                 struct kvm_arm_copy_mte_tags *copy_tags);
>
> +void set_default_id_regs(struct kvm *kvm);
> +
>  /* Guest/host FPSIMD coordination helpers */
>  int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index e4727dc771bf..5f497a0af254 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
>         kvm->arch.max_vcpus = kvm_arm_default_max_vcpus();
>
>         set_default_spectre(kvm);
> +       set_default_id_regs(kvm);
>
>         return ret;
>  out_free_stage2_pgd:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index e3ec1a44f94d..80dc62f98ef0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
>
>  #include "trace.h"
>
> +static u64 __read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 id);
> +
>  /*
>   * All of this file is extremely similar to the ARM coproc.c, but the
>   * types are different. My gut feeling is that it should be pretty
> @@ -273,7 +275,7 @@ static bool trap_loregion(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>                           struct sys_reg_params *p,
>                           const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
>  {
> -       u64 val = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1);
> +       u64 val = __read_id_reg(vcpu, SYS_ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1);
>         u32 sr = reg_to_encoding(r);
>
>         if (!(val & (0xfUL << ID_AA64MMFR1_LOR_SHIFT))) {
> @@ -1059,17 +1061,9 @@ static bool access_arch_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>         return true;
>  }
>
> -/* Read a sanitised cpufeature ID register by sys_reg_desc */
> -static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> -               struct sys_reg_desc const *r, bool raz)
> +static u64 __read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 id)
>  {
> -       u32 id = reg_to_encoding(r);
> -       u64 val;
> -
> -       if (raz)
> -               return 0;
> -
> -       val = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
> +       u64 val = vcpu->kvm->arch.id_regs[IDREG_IDX(id)];
>
>         switch (id) {
>         case SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1:
> @@ -1119,6 +1113,14 @@ static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>         return val;
>  }
>
> +static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +                      struct sys_reg_desc const *r, bool raz)
> +{
> +       u32 id = reg_to_encoding(r);
> +
> +       return raz ? 0 : __read_id_reg(vcpu, id);
> +}
> +
>  static unsigned int id_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>                                   const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
>  {
> @@ -1223,9 +1225,8 @@ static int set_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  /*
>   * cpufeature ID register user accessors
>   *
> - * For now, these registers are immutable for userspace, so no values
> - * are stored, and for set_id_reg() we don't allow the effective value
> - * to be changed.
> + * For now, these registers are immutable for userspace, so for set_id_reg()
> + * we don't allow the effective value to be changed.
>   */
>  static int __get_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>                         const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
> @@ -1237,7 +1238,7 @@ static int __get_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>         return reg_to_user(uaddr, &val, id);
>  }
>
> -static int __set_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +static int __set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>                         const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
>                         bool raz)

Minor nit: why remove the const in this patch? This is required for a
future patch but not for this one.

Thanks,
/fuad


>  {
> @@ -1837,8 +1838,8 @@ static bool trap_dbgdidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>         if (p->is_write) {
>                 return ignore_write(vcpu, p);
>         } else {
> -               u64 dfr = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
> -               u64 pfr = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1);
> +               u64 dfr = __read_id_reg(vcpu, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
> +               u64 pfr = __read_id_reg(vcpu, SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1);
>                 u32 el3 = !!cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(pfr, ID_AA64PFR0_EL3_SHIFT);
>
>                 p->regval = ((((dfr >> ID_AA64DFR0_WRPS_SHIFT) & 0xf) << 28) |
> @@ -2850,3 +2851,30 @@ void kvm_sys_reg_table_init(void)
>         /* Clear all higher bits. */
>         cache_levels &= (1 << (i*3))-1;
>  }
> +
> +/*
> + * Set the guest's ID registers that are defined in sys_reg_descs[]
> + * with ID_SANITISED() to the host's sanitized value.
> + */
> +void set_default_id_regs(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +       int i;
> +       u32 id;
> +       const struct sys_reg_desc *rd;
> +       u64 val;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sys_reg_descs); i++) {
> +               rd = &sys_reg_descs[i];
> +               if (rd->access != access_id_reg)
> +                       /* Not ID register, or hidden/reserved ID register */
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               id = reg_to_encoding(rd);
> +               if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_id_reg(id)))
> +                       /* Shouldn't happen */
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               val = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
> +               kvm->arch.id_regs[IDREG_IDX(id)] = val;
> +       }
> +}
> --
> 2.34.1.448.ga2b2bfdf31-goog
>
> _______________________________________________
> kvmarm mailing list
> kvmarm at lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list