[PATCH v9 4/4] clk: meson: add sub MMC clock controller driver

Liang Yang liang.yang at amlogic.com
Tue Jan 18 18:55:38 PST 2022


Hi Stephen,

On 2022/1/19 10:22, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
> 
> Quoting Liang Yang (2022-01-16 22:24:28)
>>
>>
>> On 2022/1/15 7:01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>>
>>> Quoting Liang Yang (2022-01-13 21:14:46)
>>>> On 2022/1/14 5:35, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>>> Quoting Liang Yang (2022-01-13 03:57:45)
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/meson/mmc-clkc.c b/drivers/clk/meson/mmc-clkc.c
>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>> index 000000000000..f53977f61390
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/meson/mmc-clkc.c
>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
>>> [..]
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +static int mmc_clkc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +       struct clk_hw_onecell_data *onecell_data;
>>>>>> +       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>>>> +       struct mmc_clkc_data *data;
>>>>>> +       struct regmap *map;
>>>>>> +       struct clk_regmap *clk, *core;
>>>>>> +       struct meson_sclk_div_data *div_data;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +       /*cast to drop the const in match->data*/
>>>>>
>>>>> Space after *, also why do we need to cast away const? The user of this
>>>>> pointer passes it all the way down to mmc_clkc_register_clk() which
>>>>> could take the data as const void pointer and decide to cast away const
>>>>> there.
>>>>
>>>> if use 'const' here, it  will report a warning:
>>>> drivers/clk/meson/mmc-clkc.c:224:7: error: assignment discards ‘const’
>>>> qualifier from pointer targe
>>>> t type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
>>>>
>>>>      data = (const struct mmc_clkc_data *)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
>>>
>>> Of course. The type declaration up above needs const added to it.The parm of mmc_clkc_register_clk_with_parent(...., void *data) does not
>> have 'const', so make the type declaration cause a further 'const' cast
>> warning. Could i copy these infos just like below:
> 
> Why can't you push const down to the function that really cares to
> remove const?
em, it is really ok to me. i will fix it next version.
> 
> .



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list