[PATCH v6 8/9] mm: multigenerational lru: user interface

[Yu Zhao]

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 05:45:40PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 01:35:52AM -0700, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:27:19PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 01:22:27PM -0700, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > > > Add /sys/kernel/mm/lru_gen/enabled as a runtime kill switch.
> > > > 
> > > > Add /sys/kernel/mm/lru_gen/min_ttl_ms for thrashing prevention.
> > > > Compared with the size-based approach, e.g., [1], this time-based
> > > > approach has the following advantages:
> > > > 1) It's easier to configure because it's agnostic to applications and
> > > >    memory sizes.
> > > > 2) It's more reliable because it's directly wired to the OOM killer.
> > > > 
> > > > Add /sys/kernel/debug/lru_gen for working set estimation and proactive
> > > > reclaim. Compared with the page table-based approach and the PFN-based
> > > > approach, e.g., mm/damon/[vp]addr.c, this lruvec-based approach has
> > > > the following advantages:
> > > > 1) It offers better choices because it's aware of memcgs, NUMA nodes,
> > > >    shared mappings and unmapped page cache.
> > > > 2) It's more scalable because it's O(nr_hot_evictable_pages), whereas
> > > >    the PFN-based approach is O(nr_total_pages).
> > > > 
> > > > Add /sys/kernel/debug/lru_gen_full for debugging.
> > > > 
> > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211130201652.2218636d@mail.inbox.lv/
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao at google.com>
> > > > Tested-by: Konstantin Kharlamov <Hi-Angel at yandex.ru>
> > > > ---
> > > >  Documentation/vm/index.rst        |   1 +
> > > >  Documentation/vm/multigen_lru.rst |  62 +++++
> > > 
> > > The description of user visible interfaces should go to
> > > Documentation/admin-guide/mm
> > > 
> > > Documentation/vm/multigen_lru.rst should have contained design description
> > > and the implementation details and it would be great to actually have such
> > > document.
> > 
> > Will do, thanks.
> > 
> > > >  include/linux/nodemask.h          |   1 +
> > > >  mm/vmscan.c                       | 415 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  4 files changed, 479 insertions(+)
> > > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/vm/multigen_lru.rst
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/vm/index.rst b/Documentation/vm/index.rst
> > > > index 6f5ffef4b716..f25e755b4ff4 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/vm/index.rst
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/vm/index.rst
> > > > @@ -38,3 +38,4 @@ algorithms.  If you are looking for advice on simply allocating memory, see the
> > > >     unevictable-lru
> > > >     z3fold
> > > >     zsmalloc
> > > > +   multigen_lru
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/vm/multigen_lru.rst b/Documentation/vm/multigen_lru.rst
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..6f9e0181348b
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/vm/multigen_lru.rst
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
> > > > +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > > +
> > > > +=====================
> > > > +Multigenerational LRU
> > > > +=====================
> > > > +
> > > > +Quick start
> > > > +===========
> > > > +Runtime configurations
> > > > +----------------------
> > > > +:Required: Write ``1`` to ``/sys/kernel/mm/lru_gen/enable`` if the
> > > > + feature wasn't enabled by default.
> > > 
> > > Required for what? This sentence seem to lack context. Maybe add an
> > > overview what is Multigenerational LRU so that users will have an idea what
> > > these knobs control.
> > 
> > Apparently I left an important part of this quick start in the next
> > patch, where Kconfig options are added. I'm wonder whether I should
> > squash the next patch into this one.
> 
> I think documentation deserves a separate patch.

Will do.