[PATCH v7 5/7] clk: imx: Add initial support for i.MXRT1050 clock driver

[Jesse Taube]

On 1/10/22 17:48, Abel Vesa wrote:
> On 22-01-10 12:12:00, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Quoting Jesse Taube (2022-01-09 11:07:42)
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       clk_hw_data->num = IMXRT1050_CLK_END;
>>>>> +       hws = clk_hw_data->hws;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       hws[IMXRT1050_CLK_OSC] = __clk_get_hw(of_clk_get_by_name(np, "osc"));
>>>>
>>>> Use clk_parent_data instead and reference the binding name with .fw_name
>>>
>>> Hi Stephen, sorry to bother you again.
>>> I'm wondering if adding `clk_parent_data` is necessary as it seems like
>>> it wold be a big change and the other IMX boards haven't implemented
>>> this yet would it be okay if I don't do this, or if it is necessary
>>> could you link to a patch set to change it.
>>>
>>
>> Is it a big change because the imx_clk_hw*() APIs aren't prepared for
>> non-string parents? Can you make some clk_parent_data based APIs and
>> migrate things over gradually? This is really a question for i.MX folks
>> to see if anyone is working on moving away from the string names.
> 
> I'm currently looking into it. I would suggest we take this patch as is
> and I'll switch it later on to clk_parent_data.
Thanks so much that would be great!

Should I sent the other changes requested I have them ready? Or should i 
wait.

Best regards
	Jesse Taube