[PATCH CFT net-next 0/6] net: stmmac/xpcs: modernise PCS support

[Wong Vee Khee]

On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 01:40:06PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 01:57:29PM +0800, Wong Vee Khee wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 01:11:40PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > This series updates xpcs and stmmac for the recent changes to phylink
> > > to better support split PCS and to get rid of private MAC validation
> > > functions.
> > > 
> > > This series is slightly more involved than other conversions as stmmac
> > > has already had optional proper split PCS support.
> > > 
> > > The patches:
> > > 
> > > 1) Provide a function to query the xpcs for the interface modes that
> > >    are supported.
> > > 
> > > 2) Populates the MAC capabilities and switches stmmac_validate() to use
> > >    phylink_get_linkmodes(). We do not use phylink_generic_validate() yet
> > >    as (a) we do not always have the supported interfaces populated, and
> > >    (b) the existing code does not restrict based on interface. There
> > >    should be no functional effect from this patch.
> > > 
> > > 3) Populates phylink's supported interfaces from the xpcs when the xpcs
> > >    is configured by firmware and also the firmware configured interface
> > >    mode. Note: this will restrict stmmac to only supporting these
> > >    interfaces modes - stmmac maintainers need to verify that this
> > >    behaviour is acceptable.
> > > 
> > > 4) stmmac_validate() tail-calls xpcs_validate(), but we don't need it to
> > >    now that PCS have their own validation method. Convert stmmac and
> > >    xpcs to use this method instead.
> > > 
> > > 5) xpcs sets the poll field of phylink_pcs to true, meaning xpcs
> > >    requires its status to be polled. There is no need to also set the
> > >    phylink_config.pcs_poll. Remove this.
> > > 
> > > 6) Switch to phylink_generic_validate(). This is probably the most
> > >    contravertial change in this patch set as this will cause the MAC to
> > >    restrict link modes based on the interface mode. From an inspection
> > >    of the xpcs driver, this should be safe, as XPCS only further
> > >    restricts the link modes to a subset of these (whether that is
> > >    correct or not is not an issue I am addressing here.) For
> > >    implementations that do not use xpcs, this is a more open question
> > >    and needs feedback from stmmac maintainers.
> > > 
> > > Please review and test this series. Thanks!
> > > 
> > 
> > Tested this patch series on my Intel Elkhart Lake setup with Marvell
> > 88E1510 PHY. 
> > 
> > Everything works perfectly!
> 
> Can I take that as a tested-by please?
> 

Sure.

Tested-by: Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong at linux.intel.com> # Intel EHL

> It would be good to get some feedback from other stmmac users, since I
> believe stmmac is used in multiple different configurations.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -- 
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!