[PATCH v12 03/10] arm64: Rename stackframe to unwind_state

Mark Rutland mark.rutland at arm.com
Thu Jan 6 08:11:31 PST 2022


On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 10:52:05AM -0600, madvenka at linux.microsoft.com wrote:
> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka at linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> Rename "struct stackframe" to "struct unwind_state" for consistency and
> better naming. Accordingly, rename variable/argument "frame" to "state".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka at linux.microsoft.com>

Thanks for this!

Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>

Mark.

> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c      | 66 ++++++++++++++---------------
>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
> index 3a15d376ab36..fc828c3c5dfd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ struct stack_info {
>   *               associated with the most recently encountered replacement lr
>   *               value.
>   */
> -struct stackframe {
> +struct unwind_state {
>  	unsigned long fp;
>  	unsigned long pc;
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(stacks_done, __NR_STACK_TYPES);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> index b980d96dccfc..a1a7ff93b84f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> @@ -33,13 +33,13 @@
>   */
>  
>  
> -static void unwind_init(struct stackframe *frame, unsigned long fp,
> +static void unwind_init(struct unwind_state *state, unsigned long fp,
>  			unsigned long pc)
>  {
> -	frame->fp = fp;
> -	frame->pc = pc;
> +	state->fp = fp;
> +	state->pc = pc;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
> -	frame->kr_cur = NULL;
> +	state->kr_cur = NULL;
>  #endif
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -51,9 +51,9 @@ static void unwind_init(struct stackframe *frame, unsigned long fp,
>  	 * prev_fp value won't be used, but we set it to 0 such that it is
>  	 * definitely not an accessible stack address.
>  	 */
> -	bitmap_zero(frame->stacks_done, __NR_STACK_TYPES);
> -	frame->prev_fp = 0;
> -	frame->prev_type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
> +	bitmap_zero(state->stacks_done, __NR_STACK_TYPES);
> +	state->prev_fp = 0;
> +	state->prev_type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -64,9 +64,9 @@ static void unwind_init(struct stackframe *frame, unsigned long fp,
>   * and the location (but not the fp value) of B.
>   */
>  static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
> -			       struct stackframe *frame)
> +			       struct unwind_state *state)
>  {
> -	unsigned long fp = frame->fp;
> +	unsigned long fp = state->fp;
>  	struct stack_info info;
>  
>  	/* Final frame; nothing to unwind */
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
>  	if (!on_accessible_stack(tsk, fp, 16, &info))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (test_bit(info.type, frame->stacks_done))
> +	if (test_bit(info.type, state->stacks_done))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -95,27 +95,27 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
>  	 * stack to another, it's never valid to unwind back to that first
>  	 * stack.
>  	 */
> -	if (info.type == frame->prev_type) {
> -		if (fp <= frame->prev_fp)
> +	if (info.type == state->prev_type) {
> +		if (fp <= state->prev_fp)
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  	} else {
> -		set_bit(frame->prev_type, frame->stacks_done);
> +		set_bit(state->prev_type, state->stacks_done);
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Record this frame record's values and location. The prev_fp and
>  	 * prev_type are only meaningful to the next unwind_next() invocation.
>  	 */
> -	frame->fp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
> -	frame->pc = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 8));
> -	frame->prev_fp = fp;
> -	frame->prev_type = info.type;
> +	state->fp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
> +	state->pc = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 8));
> +	state->prev_fp = fp;
> +	state->prev_type = info.type;
>  
> -	frame->pc = ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(frame->pc);
> +	state->pc = ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(state->pc);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
>  	if (tsk->ret_stack &&
> -		(frame->pc == (unsigned long)return_to_handler)) {
> +		(state->pc == (unsigned long)return_to_handler)) {
>  		unsigned long orig_pc;
>  		/*
>  		 * This is a case where function graph tracer has
> @@ -123,16 +123,16 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
>  		 * to hook a function return.
>  		 * So replace it to an original value.
>  		 */
> -		orig_pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(tsk, NULL, frame->pc,
> -						(void *)frame->fp);
> -		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(frame->pc == orig_pc))
> +		orig_pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(tsk, NULL, state->pc,
> +						(void *)state->fp);
> +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(state->pc == orig_pc))
>  			return -EINVAL;
> -		frame->pc = orig_pc;
> +		state->pc = orig_pc;
>  	}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER */
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
> -	if (is_kretprobe_trampoline(frame->pc))
> -		frame->pc = kretprobe_find_ret_addr(tsk, (void *)frame->fp, &frame->kr_cur);
> +	if (is_kretprobe_trampoline(state->pc))
> +		state->pc = kretprobe_find_ret_addr(tsk, (void *)state->fp, &state->kr_cur);
>  #endif
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -140,15 +140,15 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
>  
>  static void notrace unwind(struct task_struct *tsk,
> -			   struct stackframe *frame,
> +			   struct unwind_state *state,
>  			   bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *data)
>  {
>  	while (1) {
>  		int ret;
>  
> -		if (!fn(data, frame->pc))
> +		if (!fn(data, state->pc))
>  			break;
> -		ret = unwind_next(tsk, frame);
> +		ret = unwind_next(tsk, state);
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			break;
>  	}
> @@ -192,17 +192,17 @@ noinline notrace void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
>  			      void *cookie, struct task_struct *task,
>  			      struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> -	struct stackframe frame;
> +	struct unwind_state state;
>  
>  	if (regs)
> -		unwind_init(&frame, regs->regs[29], regs->pc);
> +		unwind_init(&state, regs->regs[29], regs->pc);
>  	else if (task == current)
> -		unwind_init(&frame,
> +		unwind_init(&state,
>  				(unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(1),
>  				(unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0));
>  	else
> -		unwind_init(&frame, thread_saved_fp(task),
> +		unwind_init(&state, thread_saved_fp(task),
>  				thread_saved_pc(task));
>  
> -	unwind(task, &frame, consume_entry, cookie);
> +	unwind(task, &state, consume_entry, cookie);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list