[PATCH 1/2] pwm: brcmstb: Implement .apply() callback
Uwe Kleine-König
u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de
Mon Feb 14 00:23:53 PST 2022
To eventually get rid of all legacy drivers convert this driver to the
modern world implementing .apply().
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-brcmstb.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-brcmstb.c
index 3b529f82b97c..99974390aa38 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-brcmstb.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-brcmstb.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static inline struct brcmstb_pwm *to_brcmstb_pwm(struct pwm_chip *chip)
* "on" time, so this translates directly into our HW programming here.
*/
static int brcmstb_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
- int duty_ns, int period_ns)
+ u64 duty_ns, u64 period_ns)
{
struct brcmstb_pwm *p = to_brcmstb_pwm(chip);
unsigned long pc, dc, cword = CONST_VAR_F_MAX;
@@ -114,22 +114,17 @@ static int brcmstb_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
}
while (1) {
- u64 rate, tmp;
+ u64 rate;
/*
* Calculate the base rate from base frequency and current
* cword
*/
rate = (u64)clk_get_rate(p->clk) * (u64)cword;
- do_div(rate, 1 << CWORD_BIT_SIZE);
+ rate >>= CWORD_BIT_SIZE;
- tmp = period_ns * rate;
- do_div(tmp, NSEC_PER_SEC);
- pc = tmp;
-
- tmp = (duty_ns + 1) * rate;
- do_div(tmp, NSEC_PER_SEC);
- dc = tmp;
+ pc = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(period_ns, rate, NSEC_PER_SEC);
+ dc = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(duty_ns + 1, rate, NSEC_PER_SEC);
/*
* We can be called with separate duty and period updates,
@@ -202,26 +197,34 @@ static inline void brcmstb_pwm_enable_set(struct brcmstb_pwm *p,
spin_unlock(&p->lock);
}
-static int brcmstb_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
+static int brcmstb_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+ const struct pwm_state *state)
{
struct brcmstb_pwm *p = to_brcmstb_pwm(chip);
+ int err;
- brcmstb_pwm_enable_set(p, pwm->hwpwm, true);
+ if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
+ return -EINVAL;
- return 0;
-}
+ if (!state->enabled) {
+ if (pwm->state.enabled)
+ brcmstb_pwm_enable_set(p, pwm->hwpwm, false);
-static void brcmstb_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
-{
- struct brcmstb_pwm *p = to_brcmstb_pwm(chip);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ err = brcmstb_pwm_config(chip, pwm, state->duty_cycle, state->period);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
- brcmstb_pwm_enable_set(p, pwm->hwpwm, false);
+ if (!pwm->state.enabled)
+ brcmstb_pwm_enable_set(p, pwm->hwpwm, true);
+
+ return 0;
}
static const struct pwm_ops brcmstb_pwm_ops = {
- .config = brcmstb_pwm_config,
- .enable = brcmstb_pwm_enable,
- .disable = brcmstb_pwm_disable,
+ .apply = brcmstb_pwm_apply,
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
};
--
2.34.1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list