[PATCH v4 03/11] media: atmel: atmel-isc: implement media controller
Jacopo Mondi
jacopo at jmondi.org
Fri Feb 11 05:23:33 PST 2022
Hi Eugen
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:32:14PM +0000, Eugen.Hristev at microchip.com wrote:
> On 2/11/22 1:55 PM, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > Hi Eugen
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 10:32:43AM +0000, Eugen.Hristev at microchip.com wrote:
> >> On 2/10/22 7:49 PM, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> >>> Hi Eugen
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 06:59:37AM +0000, Eugen.Hristev at microchip.com wrote:
> >>>> On 2/8/22 9:30 PM, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Eugen
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 10:33:31AM +0000, Eugen.Hristev at microchip.com wrote:
> >>>>>> On 2/8/22 10:59 AM, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi Eugen
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 01:40:31PM +0000, Eugen.Hristev at microchip.com wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 2/7/22 2:44 PM, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Eugen
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 03:14:08PM +0200, Eugen Hristev wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Implement the support for media-controller.
> >>>>>>>>>> This means that the capabilities of the driver have changed and now
> >>>>>>>>>> it also advertises the IO_MC .
> >>>>>>>>>> The driver will register it's media device, and add the video entity to this
> >>>>>>>>>> media device. The subdevices are registered to the same media device.
> >>>>>>>>>> The ISC will have a base entity which is auto-detected as atmel_isc_base.
> >>>>>>>>>> It will also register a subdevice that allows cropping of the incoming frame
> >>>>>>>>>> to the maximum frame size supported by the ISC.
> >>>>>>>>>> The ISC will create a link between the subdevice that is asynchronously
> >>>>>>>>>> registered and the atmel_isc_scaler entity.
> >>>>>>>>>> Then, the atmel_isc_scaler and atmel_isc_base are connected through another
> >>>>>>>>>> link.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev at microchip.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>>>> Changes in v4:
> >>>>>>>>>> As suggested by Jacopo:
> >>>>>>>>>> - renamed atmel_isc_mc to atmel_isc_scaler.c
> >>>>>>>>>> - moved init_mc/clean_mc to isc_base file
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Changes in v2:
> >>>>>>>>>> - implement try formats
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> drivers/media/platform/atmel/Makefile | 2 +-
> >>>>>>>>>> drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc-base.c | 73 +++++-
> >>>>>>>>>> .../media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc-scaler.c | 245 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>>>>> drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.h | 37 +++
> >>>>>>>>>> .../media/platform/atmel/atmel-sama5d2-isc.c | 14 +-
> >>>>>>>>>> .../media/platform/atmel/atmel-sama7g5-isc.c | 12 +-
> >>>>>>>>>> 6 files changed, 375 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc-scaler.c
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/Makefile b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/Makefile
> >>>>>>>>>> index 794e8f739287..f02d03df89d6 100644
> >>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/Makefile
> >>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/Makefile
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> >>>>>>>>>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> >>>>>>>>>> atmel-isc-objs = atmel-sama5d2-isc.o
> >>>>>>>>>> atmel-xisc-objs = atmel-sama7g5-isc.o
> >>>>>>>>>> -atmel-isc-common-objs = atmel-isc-base.o atmel-isc-clk.o
> >>>>>>>>>> +atmel-isc-common-objs = atmel-isc-base.o atmel-isc-clk.o atmel-isc-scaler.o
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ATMEL_ISI) += atmel-isi.o
> >>>>>>>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ATMEL_ISC_BASE) += atmel-isc-common.o
> >>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc-base.c b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc-base.c
> >>>>>>>>>> index 6b0005987a17..6b482270eb93 100644
> >>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc-base.c
> >>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc-base.c
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -1710,6 +1710,7 @@ static int isc_async_bound(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
> >>>>>>>>>> struct isc_device, v4l2_dev);
> >>>>>>>>>> struct isc_subdev_entity *subdev_entity =
> >>>>>>>>>> container_of(notifier, struct isc_subdev_entity, notifier);
> >>>>>>>>>> + int pad;
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> if (video_is_registered(&isc->video_dev)) {
> >>>>>>>>>> v4l2_err(&isc->v4l2_dev, "only supports one sub-device.\n");
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -1718,6 +1719,16 @@ static int isc_async_bound(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> subdev_entity->sd = subdev;
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> + pad = media_entity_get_fwnode_pad(&subdev->entity, asd->match.fwnode,
> >>>>>>>>>> + MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE);
> >>>>>>>>>> + if (pad < 0) {
> >>>>>>>>>> + v4l2_err(&isc->v4l2_dev, "failed to find pad for %s\n",
> >>>>>>>>>> + subdev->name);
> >>>>>>>>>> + return pad;
> >>>>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->remote_pad = pad;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> return 0;
> >>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -1732,8 +1743,8 @@ static void isc_async_unbind(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
> >>>>>>>>>> v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&isc->ctrls.handler);
> >>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> -static struct isc_format *find_format_by_code(struct isc_device *isc,
> >>>>>>>>>> - unsigned int code, int *index)
> >>>>>>>>>> +struct isc_format *isc_find_format_by_code(struct isc_device *isc,
> >>>>>>>>>> + unsigned int code, int *index)
> >>>>>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>>>>> struct isc_format *fmt = &isc->formats_list[0];
> >>>>>>>>>> unsigned int i;
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -1749,6 +1760,7 @@ static struct isc_format *find_format_by_code(struct isc_device *isc,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> return NULL;
> >>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(isc_find_format_by_code);
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> static int isc_formats_init(struct isc_device *isc)
> >>>>>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -1765,7 +1777,7 @@ static int isc_formats_init(struct isc_device *isc)
> >>>>>>>>>> NULL, &mbus_code)) {
> >>>>>>>>>> mbus_code.index++;
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> - fmt = find_format_by_code(isc, mbus_code.code, &i);
> >>>>>>>>>> + fmt = isc_find_format_by_code(isc, mbus_code.code, &i);
> >>>>>>>>>> if (!fmt) {
> >>>>>>>>>> v4l2_warn(&isc->v4l2_dev, "Mbus code %x not supported\n",
> >>>>>>>>>> mbus_code.code);
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -1891,7 +1903,8 @@ static int isc_async_complete(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
> >>>>>>>>>> vdev->queue = q;
> >>>>>>>>>> vdev->lock = &isc->lock;
> >>>>>>>>>> vdev->ctrl_handler = &isc->ctrls.handler;
> >>>>>>>>>> - vdev->device_caps = V4L2_CAP_STREAMING | V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_CAPTURE;
> >>>>>>>>>> + vdev->device_caps = V4L2_CAP_STREAMING | V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_CAPTURE |
> >>>>>>>>>> + V4L2_CAP_IO_MC;
> >>>>>>>>>> video_set_drvdata(vdev, isc);
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> ret = video_register_device(vdev, VFL_TYPE_VIDEO, -1);
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -1901,8 +1914,18 @@ static int isc_async_complete(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
> >>>>>>>>>> goto isc_async_complete_err;
> >>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> + ret = isc_scaler_link(isc);
> >>>>>>>>>> + if (ret < 0)
> >>>>>>>>>> + goto isc_async_complete_unregister_device;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + ret = media_device_register(&isc->mdev);
> >>>>>>>>>> + if (ret < 0)
> >>>>>>>>>> + goto isc_async_complete_unregister_device;
> >>>>>>>>>> return 0;
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +isc_async_complete_unregister_device:
> >>>>>>>>>> + video_unregister_device(vdev);
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> isc_async_complete_err:
> >>>>>>>>>> mutex_destroy(&isc->lock);
> >>>>>>>>>> return ret;
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -1969,6 +1992,48 @@ int isc_pipeline_init(struct isc_device *isc)
> >>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(isc_pipeline_init);
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +int isc_mc_init(struct isc_device *isc, u32 ver)
> >>>>>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>>>>> + const struct of_device_id *match;
> >>>>>>>>>> + int ret;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->video_dev.entity.function = MEDIA_ENT_F_IO_V4L;
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->video_dev.entity.flags = MEDIA_ENT_FL_DEFAULT;
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Should you set entity.ops.link_validate = v4l2_subdev_link_validate
> >>>>>>>>> to be able to have the media pipeline validated at
> >>>>>>>>> media_pipeline_start() time ?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I am doing that in a subsequent patch. Things are not completely ready
> >>>>>>>> at this moment, because ISC still relies on the old mechanism to call
> >>>>>>>> v4l2_subdev_call with set_fmt on the subdevice (which subsequent patch
> >>>>>>>> removes and adds checks to the link validate ).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I see.. the subsequent patches are not part of this series, right ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> No. Patch 7 does this. In that patch, the link validation is created and
> >>>>>> all the logic of format propagation is removed and reworked, and creates
> >>>>>> the need for the link_validate call
> >>>>>> Could you have also a look at that patch ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ah ups, 7 was not in my inbox with the rest of the series. Just
> >>>>> noticed. I had even reviewed the previous version, I should have
> >>>>> remembered link_validate was added later
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think patches 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 from this series do not depend on
> >>>>>>> the introduction of media controller or the scaler, right ? (I'm not
> >>>>>>> sure if the DTS patches do).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Do DTS patches depend on media-controller plumbing ?
> >>>>
> >>>> I think not, but, I have not tested them without the media controller.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If that's the case, would it make sense to to fast-track them (as some
> >>>>>>> of them are fixes) and then on top plumb the media controller
> >>>>>>> infrastructure with this patch and the ones you have been mentioning ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It would make sense.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Once the other discussion with Hans about the stop state it might make
> >>>>> sense to fastrack the first part of the series ?
> >>>>
> >>>> The other three patches (4,5,6) are quite independent and can go faster.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->pads[ISC_PAD_SINK].flags = MEDIA_PAD_FL_SINK;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + ret = media_entity_pads_init(&isc->video_dev.entity, ISC_PADS_NUM,
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->pads);
> >>>>>>>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
> >>>>>>>>>> + dev_err(isc->dev, "media entity init failed\n");
> >>>>>>>>>> + return ret;
> >>>>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->mdev.dev = isc->dev;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + match = of_match_node(isc->dev->driver->of_match_table,
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->dev->of_node);
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + strscpy(isc->mdev.driver_name, KBUILD_MODNAME,
> >>>>>>>>>> + sizeof(isc->mdev.driver_name));
> >>>>>>>>>> + strscpy(isc->mdev.model, match->compatible, sizeof(isc->mdev.model));
> >>>>>>>>>> + snprintf(isc->mdev.bus_info, sizeof(isc->mdev.bus_info), "platform:%s",
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->v4l2_dev.name);
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->mdev.hw_revision = ver;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + media_device_init(&isc->mdev);
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->v4l2_dev.mdev = &isc->mdev;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + return isc_scaler_init(isc);
> >>>>>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(isc_mc_init);
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> +void isc_mc_cleanup(struct isc_device *isc)
> >>>>>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>>>>> + media_entity_cleanup(&isc->video_dev.entity);
> >>>>>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(isc_mc_cleanup);
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> /* regmap configuration */
> >>>>>>>>>> #define ATMEL_ISC_REG_MAX 0xd5c
> >>>>>>>>>> const struct regmap_config isc_regmap_config = {
> >>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc-scaler.c b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc-scaler.c
> >>>>>>>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>>>>>>> index 000000000000..ec95c9665883
> >>>>>>>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc-scaler.c
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
> >>>>>>>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> >>>>>>>>>> +/*
> >>>>>>>>>> + * Microchip Image Sensor Controller (ISC) Scaler entity support
> >>>>>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2021 Microchip Technology, Inc.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Time flies! It's 2022 already :)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>>>>> + * Author: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev at microchip.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> +#include <media/media-device.h>
> >>>>>>>>>> +#include <media/media-entity.h>
> >>>>>>>>>> +#include <media/v4l2-device.h>
> >>>>>>>>>> +#include <media/v4l2-subdev.h>
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> +#include "atmel-isc-regs.h"
> >>>>>>>>>> +#include "atmel-isc.h"
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> +static int isc_scaler_get_fmt(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct v4l2_subdev_state *sd_state,
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct v4l2_subdev_format *format)
> >>>>>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct isc_device *isc = container_of(sd, struct isc_device, scaler_sd);
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *v4l2_try_fmt;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + if (format->which == V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_TRY) {
> >>>>>>>>>> + v4l2_try_fmt = v4l2_subdev_get_try_format(sd, sd_state,
> >>>>>>>>>> + format->pad);
> >>>>>>>>>> + format->format = *v4l2_try_fmt;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + format->format = isc->scaler_format;
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> isc->scaler_format is only used inside this file if I'm not mistaken.
> >>>>>>>>> I wonder why it lives in the isc_device struct.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> isc_device is a placeholder for all isc things.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I would not create a separate struct in this file that would have to be
> >>>>>>>> allocated etc... just for one two things. So I preferred to have it in
> >>>>>>>> the same place as all the other things.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> +static int isc_scaler_set_fmt(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct v4l2_subdev_state *sd_state,
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct v4l2_subdev_format *req_fmt)
> >>>>>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct isc_device *isc = container_of(sd, struct isc_device, scaler_sd);
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *v4l2_try_fmt;
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct isc_format *fmt;
> >>>>>>>>>> + unsigned int i;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + if (req_fmt->pad == ISC_SCALER_PAD_SOURCE)
> >>>>>>>>>> + v4l_bound_align_image
> >>>>>>>>>> + (&req_fmt->format.width, 16, isc->max_width, 0,
> >>>>>>>>>> + &req_fmt->format.height, 16, isc->max_height, 0, 0);
> >>>>>>>>>> + else
> >>>>>>>>>> + v4l_bound_align_image
> >>>>>>>>>> + (&req_fmt->format.width, 16, 10000, 0,
> >>>>>>>>>> + &req_fmt->format.height, 16, 10000, 0, 0);
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Where does 10000 come from ?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It's a random number. Do you have any suggestion for a better one ?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> An actual HW limit ? :)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> There is no hardware limit. The ISC just stops sampling pixels once the
> >>>>>> crop limit is reached. The element that generates pixels could go on
> >>>>>> forever , or until the next HBLANK/VBLANK. So what limit could I place
> >>>>>> here ?
> >>>>>> The cropping is mandatory, otherwise there could be an overflow w.r.t.
> >>>>>> the buffer size if the ISC would sample more pixels than the software
> >>>>>> expects it to.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Maybe this would be much more clear with my comments below (where I will
> >>>>>>>> explain what the isc scaler does )
> >>>>>>>> In short, it allows the other entity in the link to 'sink' a huge format
> >>>>>>>> into this 'scaler' . Because the scaler can crop anything basically down
> >>>>>>>> to the biggest format size the ISC could handle.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> doesn't it have any documented input size limit ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> As stated above, ISC handles a pixel stream and stores it in an internal
> >>>>>> SRAM. ISC stops sampling when this SRAM is full or when the cropping
> >>>>>> limit is reached.
> >>>>>> After storing the pixels in the SRAM (which is limited to the ISC
> >>>>>> maximum frame size), the ISC will work on the pixels and then DMA the
> >>>>>> frame to another RAM.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I understand...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So whatever the input size is, only the first n-th bytes are actually
> >>>>> dumped to memory, the following ones are discarded.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes ! That's the behavior.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So the crop is always applied on the top-leftmost corner as a
> >>>>> consequence, right ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Right. Pixels come in order. The ISC does not really know how many
> >>>> pixels are coming until its memory is full (or counting until the crop
> >>>> limit is reached). After that it stops sampling pixels, and waits for
> >>>> vblank to finish the frame.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I understand why you had difficulties picking a default :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is not easy to handle, as the scaler doesn't actually applies a
> >>>>> crop but rather stops capturing after the destination buffer has been
> >>>>> saturated. So the limiting factor is the full image size, not one of
> >>>>> its dimensions, like in example the line length. This makes it hard
> >>>>> to adjust cropping to something meaningful for most use cases.
> >>>>
> >>>> I didn't know how to name this except crop. It 'crops out' what does not
> >>>> fit in the internal memory of the ISC
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In your below example you suggest that an image size of (800000 x 10)
> >>>>> would theoretically be captured correctly. What if the input is of
> >>>>> size (800000 x 10 + 1). What size would you set the crop rectangle to ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I wouldn't however be too much concerned for the moment, but I would
> >>>>> record this in a comment ?
> >>>>
> >>>> I discussed a bit more with designer and looked in datasheet.
> >>>> It looks like the horizontal line length is not a hard limit, but it
> >>>> makes the ISC internal ISP stop working, so I would keep the horizontal
> >>>> limit as well for now, unless an important use case (I am coming back to
> >>>> that). The vertical limit looks to be a hard requirement.
> >>>> So in short, we have to impose a vertical limit of 2464 , we cannot have
> >>>> more lines than these. So if the horizontal is 100 pixels e.g., we can
> >>>> capture only 100x2464 .
> >>>> In practice we could capture [16,3264] on the horizontal, and [16,2464]
> >>>> on the vertical, and in theory horizontal could go more like [16, 4000],
> >>>> but we have to limit the vertical, and without the internal ISP.
> >>>> So I would not haphazardly go in this direction. Let's stick to the
> >>>> datasheet maximum frame 3264x2464 .
> >>>> According to this , I changed the frame size of the ISC to be a
> >>>> continuous size from [16,16] to [3264,2464]
> >>>> About that use case that I talked about earlier, we have one sensor ,
> >>>> imx274, which is more wide, and outputs something like 3800x2100 .
> >>>> With the cropping and limitations we have in place now, this will be
> >>>> limited to 3264x2100 , which is in line with datasheet and what the ISC
> >>>> supports now.
> >>>> As in theory we could capture 3800x2100 as long as the SRAM doesn't get
> >>>> full, for now I would like to avoid capturing this size (and disable the
> >>>> internal ISP), until we have someone really asking for such kind of
> >>>> capture and with some good reasons.
> >>>> In short I would like to have the crop rectangle to 3264x2464 and the
> >>>> bounds would be limited to the incoming frame but no H>3264 and no
> >>>> V>2464. Does that make sense ?
> >>>
> >>> Just to make sure I got it: is the ISC actually able to crop on the
> >>> line length ? If you apply a 3264 limit, will the last 536 pixels of
> >>> each line will be dropped if the input frame is 3800x2100 as your
> >>> above example ?
> >>
> >> Yes. Last 536 pixels will be dropped.
> >> After the 3264 limit, no more pixels are being sampled until HBLANK.
> >>>
> >>> Or rather, is the SRAM size limit the issue and the lines gets
> >>> captured in full lenght no matter what, until the buffer gets filled up
> >>> and all the successive pixels dropped.
> >>>
> >>> In other words, do your cropped image look like:
> >>>
> >>> 3264
> >>> +--------------------------------X-----------+ 3800
> >>> |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx| |
> >>> |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx| |
> >>> |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx| |
> >>> |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx| |
> >>> |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx| |
> >>> |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx| |
> >>> |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx| |
> >>> |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx| |
> >>> |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx| |
> >>> |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx| |
> >>> |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx| |
> >>> +--------------------------------------------+ 2100
> >>>
> >>> Or rather
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 3264
> >>> +--------------------------------X-----------+ 3800
> >>> |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx|
> >>> |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx|
> >>> |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx|
> >>> |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx|
> >>> |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx|
> >>> |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx|
> >>> |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx|
> >>> |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx|
> >>> |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx| |
> >>> | |
> >>> +--------------------------------------------+ 2100
> >>>
> >>> I assume the first, as otherwise you wouldn't be able to interpret the
> >>> image as 3264x2100.
> >>
> >> Yes, the first.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I'm asking because you had the un-cropped 3280x2464 size as the ISC
> >>> source pad size in the paste of the media graph you provided below,
> >>> which might mean the output image is actually full size in lines
> >>> lenght and it's maybe missing pixels at the end, in case the ISC
> >>> operates as in the above second case.
> >>
> >> No, the image won't be padded with blanks on the right side. Actually
> >> this cannot happen due to a very big reason: the frame is being written
> >> to the main memory by a DMA controller. This DMA controller will write
> >> all the lines at consecutive addresses, and it will write exactly how
> >> many pixels are being captured by the module from the ISC named
> >> 'parallel front end' which does the cropping. Thus, the DMA will never
> >> output empty padding bytes at the end of each line, and it will not add
> >> a certain stride to each line if not instructed to. In fact the DMA can
> >> add a stride offset for the address of each line, which can be used for
> >> composing or copying the frame into another frame, but this is a
> >> different story. ( I tried this for fun, but not implemented in the
> >> driver at the moment)
> >
> > Oh that will really be interesting and it's indeed an argument for
> > hainvg a scaler subdevice indeed
> >
> >>
> >> The cropping is also mandatory even if the captured frame is less than
> >> the maximum size, because the ISC has no configuration related to frame
> >> size in fact. The parallel front end captures pixels and the dma engine
> >> will write them to memory. There is no control over this except the
> >> cropping.
> >> So for example if the software expects 640x480 but somehow someone sends
> >> more pixels, it can lead to buffer overflow if the parallel front end is
> >> not configured to ignore(crop) anything beyond 640x480 .
> >>
> >
> > I see and I think you have correctly plumbed that with the scaler sink
> > pad crop rectangle. I don't seem to find where the crop rectangle
> > sizes are actually applied to the ISC in this series ? Could you point
> > me to it for sake of my better understanding ?
>
> The ISC is already doing that for some time now:
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc-base.c#L459
>
> Initially it was more like a safety feature, because I discovered that
> there was no way of limiting the incoming pixels, and if some malevolent
> entity would just keep sending pixels, it could lead to exploits.
>
> Now, the scaler is just exposing this to the user.
>
> >
> >> With this being said, or having an understanding about the sink pad of
> >> the ISC, how should I configure the sink frame size ?
> >
> > I don't think you should, the video device format is set through the
> > usual S_FMT as it happens already.
> >
> > What I think it's missing in your implementation is only to propagate the
> > crop rectangle size of the scaler sink pad to the scaler source pad
> > format (as you don't have any composition rectangles yet) [1]
> >
> > With that done, you should be able to capture from your video device
> > in the cropped dimensions.
> >
> > The (simplified) media pipeline will look something like
> >
> > sensor
> > type: Subdev
> > pad 0 (sink) (3280, 2462)
> > -> scaler:0
> >
> > scaler
> > type: Subdev
> > pad 0 (sink) (3280, 2464)
> > crop: (3262, 2464)
> > <- sensor:0
> > pad 1 (source) (3264, 2464)
> > -> isc_common
> >
> > isc_common
> > type V4L2
> > pad 0 (sink)
> > <- scaler:1
> >
> > And the video device format set to (3264, 2464)
> >
> > Then later you might want to implement s_selection on the scaler to have
> > the crop size configurable.
> >
> > One additional question: can the crop be panned ? What I mean is that
> > you explained you can instruct the ISC to drop pixels after a certain
> > line lenght. This will cause the crop not to be centered on the input
> > image. Can the ISC be configured to ignore data -before- and -after-
> > a certain number of pixels or lines ? In that case you might want to
> > handle the top,left corner of the crop rectangle too. Anyway,
> > something for later..
>
> Looking over this, it looks possible. I have not tried it.
> It looks like configuring a minimum row /col number would make the ISC
> drop the first n pixels/ first n lines.
>
> I will have to try this, but if it works, user could configure the
> cropping area, that would be interesting ! Anyway I can't implement this
> right now, but it's a nice thing to work on later.
>
> >
> > [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/userspace-api/media/v4l/dev-subdev.html#order-of-configuration-and-format-propagation
> >
> >> Is there any possibility to avoid limits on the frame size and have it
> >> arbitrary ?
> >> I am 99% sure that v4l2-compliance will not be happy if there is no
> >> limit on the frame on entity pads (hence, I bound-aligned the frame to
> >> 16x16 up to 10k x 10k )
> >>
> >
> > That I'm not sure, but I think having size limits is required ?
> >
> > Anyway, from my side, the next version should be good to go. Thanks
> > for sticking to all my comments and questions so far!
>
> What should I do about the 10000 x 10000 pixels ?
>
If only used for aligning in
v4l_bound_align_image
(&req_fmt->format.width, 16, 10000, 0,
&req_fmt->format.height, 16, 10000, 0, 0);
I think you can use UINT_MAX to make it more explicit ?
> Thanks for reviewing !
>
> Eugen
> >
> > Thanks
> > j
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + req_fmt->format.colorspace = V4L2_COLORSPACE_SRGB;
> >>>>>>>>>> + req_fmt->format.field = V4L2_FIELD_NONE;
> >>>>>>>>>> + req_fmt->format.ycbcr_enc = V4L2_YCBCR_ENC_DEFAULT;
> >>>>>>>>>> + req_fmt->format.quantization = V4L2_QUANTIZATION_DEFAULT;
> >>>>>>>>>> + req_fmt->format.xfer_func = V4L2_XFER_FUNC_DEFAULT;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + fmt = isc_find_format_by_code(isc, req_fmt->format.code, &i);
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> So you rely on the isc format list for the scaler as well ?
> >>>>>>>>> I think it's fine as long as they are identical
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Yes, the scaler is kind of a dummy entity , but it's required by the
> >>>>>>>> media controller validation of the pipeline.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> More on this later
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + if (!fmt)
> >>>>>>>>>> + fmt = &isc->formats_list[0];
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + req_fmt->format.code = fmt->mbus_code;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + if (req_fmt->which == V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_TRY) {
> >>>>>>>>>> + v4l2_try_fmt = v4l2_subdev_get_try_format(sd, sd_state,
> >>>>>>>>>> + req_fmt->pad);
> >>>>>>>>>> + *v4l2_try_fmt = req_fmt->format;
> >>>>>>>>>> + /* Trying on the pad sink makes the source sink change too */
> >>>>>>>>>> + if (req_fmt->pad == ISC_SCALER_PAD_SINK) {
> >>>>>>>>>> + v4l2_try_fmt =
> >>>>>>>>>> + v4l2_subdev_get_try_format(sd, sd_state,
> >>>>>>>>>> + ISC_SCALER_PAD_SOURCE);
> >>>>>>>>>> + *v4l2_try_fmt = req_fmt->format;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + v4l_bound_align_image(&v4l2_try_fmt->width,
> >>>>>>>>>> + 16, isc->max_width, 0,
> >>>>>>>>>> + &v4l2_try_fmt->height,
> >>>>>>>>>> + 16, isc->max_height, 0, 0);
> >>>>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>>>>> + /* if we are just trying, we are done */
> >>>>>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->scaler_format = req_fmt->format;
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> No per-pad format but a global scaler_format ? How do you configure scaling ?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Actually, I would like to know more about the scaler device
> >>>>>>>>> capabilities. What functions can this IP perform ? Does it do
> >>>>>>>>> cropping, can it also do (down)scaling or even composition ?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I think it is worth to read
> >>>>>>>>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/userspace-api/media/v4l/dev-subdev.html#v4l2-subdev-selections
> >>>>>>>>> where it is reported how cropping and scaling are implemented by using
> >>>>>>>>> the selection API.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Figure 4.5 is particularly helpful to explain the simple crop case,
> >>>>>>>>> for which you need to implement support to by adding s_selection on
> >>>>>>>>> the sink pad TGT_CROP target.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The scaler is kind of a dummy entity.
> >>>>>>>> The problem is that different subdevices cannot be connected directly to
> >>>>>>>> a v4l entity, because the ISC does cropping on the incoming frame.
> >>>>>>>> The ISC has a limit on the total number of pixels per frame, thus it
> >>>>>>>> will do a crop.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What is this limit related to ? I don't know the ISC internals, but is
> >>>>>>> the limitation due to the overall image size, or maybe it's due to
> >>>>>>> some line buffers being limited in the size they can transfer to
> >>>>>>> memory ? Is it a limitation on the size of the image in pixels, or is
> >>>>>>> it due to a limitation of the processing bandwidth on the input
> >>>>>>> interface and thus depends on the actual size of the image in bytes ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Limitation is both on line size and full image size. From my
> >>>>>> understanding, is that the internal SRAM is limited (8 Mpixels with a
> >>>>>> small safe buffer on top in the case of sama7g5 )
> >>>>>> This SRAM could be used as 800000x10 for example, or 3200x2464 for
> >>>>>> another example. However, I am not sure if a real line of 800,000 pixels
> >>>>>> make sense, or if there is another internal mechanism in the ISC that
> >>>>>> stops it.
> >>>>>> In any case, the ISC is cropping the incoming frame from aaaXbbb up to
> >>>>>> the maximum frame that it can handle
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So, if I allow e.g. an entity that sends 3280x2464 , when the ISC can
> >>>>>>>> only handle 3264x2464 , then we have two choices:
> >>>>>>>> 1/ crop it and output the 3264x2464 -> cannot, because userspace expects
> >>>>>>>> 3280x2464, and the whole pipeline fails to configure, there is a
> >>>>>>>> mismatch between /dev/video output and what the whole pipeline produces
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm confused in first place. If the ISC cannot output anything larger
> >>>>>>> than 3264x2464, then if userspace sets a 3280x2464 size on the ISC,
> >>>>>>> this should be adjusted to 3264x2464.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> yes, that is true. However, without an entity that says 'I am doing
> >>>>>> cropping', the media pipeline will fail, because previous entity will
> >>>>>> output 3280x2464 .
> >>>>>> The conclusion to create a scaler entitity was done during my last year
> >>>>>> discussions on the IRC. I could not find a way to perform this cropping
> >>>>>> at the v4l entity side, and one reason is that the v4l entity does not
> >>>>>> support what I needed , or at least that was my understanding.
> >>>>>> You claim that the v4l entity could perform the cropping in the same
> >>>>>> entity ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I thought so, but I haven't tried to be honest
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Let's assume for a minute that it could do this. Even so, I would prefer
> >>>>>> to have a separate scaler entity to do this , for several reasons:
> >>>>>> -> I would like to be able to crop the frame arbitrarily if I want to,
> >>>>>> and the scaler would allow me to do this easier
> >>>>>> -> it would be more obvious that the frame is cropped by having this
> >>>>>> entity there
> >>>>>> -> in fact some of the ISC versions really have a down scaler, that I
> >>>>>> have not implemented yet. So it would be useful to already have this in
> >>>>>> place to be able to scale down with it at a later time.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think this last reason is enough to have an entity plumbed in
> >>>>> already
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Or is the ISC limitation on the -input- side ?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2/ deny the link, and ask the subdevice to produce the 3264x2464 which
> >>>>>>>> the ISC can handle at most -> cannot , because the sensor let's say can
> >>>>>>>> *only* produce 3280x2464 and *any* other frame size returns an error.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> buggy sensor I would say :)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I cannot tell this to the customers, and I cannot fail the whole
> >>>>>> pipeline because the sensor does not crop 16 pixels, when in fact I can
> >>>>>> do this very easily on the ISC side.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Fair enough :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The only solution to make both worlds happy, is to have a dummy entity
> >>>>>>>> called 'scaler' which in fact now it only performs a simple crop.
> >>>>>>>> It accepts any frame size at input (hence the 10000x10000 which you saw
> >>>>>>>> earlier), and outputs at most 3264x2464 the isc_max_height and
> >>>>>>>> isc_max_width.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I have a maybe dumb question: can the cropping operation be modeled
> >>>>>>> by applying a TGT_CROP rectangle (whose _BOUND size is 3280x2464) to
> >>>>>>> the atmel_isc_common entity sink pad and avoid the scaler completely ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I am not sure. This is what I wanted initially. But then I thought about
> >>>>>> the three reasons stated above for the use of the scaler entity, and
> >>>>>> discussed with folks on the IRC, and come up with the solution for the
> >>>>>> scaler entity
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So to answer your question, the isc scaler is a software model for a
> >>>>>>>> simple cropping, that would make media controller happy, and capture
> >>>>>>>> software happy.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Here it how it looks :
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Device topology
> >>>>>>>> - entity 1: atmel_isc_scaler (2 pads, 2 links)
> >>>>>>>> type V4L2 subdev subtype Unknown flags 0
> >>>>>>>> device node name /dev/v4l-subdev0
> >>>>>>>> pad0: Sink
> >>>>>>>> [fmt:SRGGB10_1X10/3280x2464 field:none colorspace:srgb
> >>>>>>>> crop.bounds:(0,0)/3264x2464
> >>>>>>>> crop:(0,0)/3264x2464]
> >>>>>>>> <- "csi2dc":1 [ENABLED,IMMUTABLE]
> >>>>>>>> pad1: Source
> >>>>>>>> [fmt:SRGGB10_1X10/3280x2464 field:none colorspace:srgb]
> >>>>>>>> -> "atmel_isc_common":0 [ENABLED,IMMUTABLE]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> - entity 4: csi2dc (2 pads, 2 links)
> >>>>>>>> type V4L2 subdev subtype Unknown flags 0
> >>>>>>>> device node name /dev/v4l-subdev1
> >>>>>>>> pad0: Sink
> >>>>>>>> [fmt:SRGGB10_1X10/3280x2464 field:none colorspace:srgb]
> >>>>>>>> <- "dw-csi.0":1 [ENABLED]
> >>>>>>>> pad1: Source
> >>>>>>>> [fmt:SRGGB10_1X10/3280x2464 field:none colorspace:srgb]
> >>>>>>>> -> "atmel_isc_scaler":0 [ENABLED,IMMUTABLE]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> - entity 7: dw-csi.0 (2 pads, 2 links)
> >>>>>>>> type V4L2 subdev subtype Unknown flags 0
> >>>>>>>> device node name /dev/v4l-subdev2
> >>>>>>>> pad0: Sink
> >>>>>>>> [fmt:SRGGB10_1X10/3280x2464]
> >>>>>>>> <- "imx219 1-0010":0 [ENABLED]
> >>>>>>>> pad1: Source
> >>>>>>>> [fmt:SRGGB10_1X10/3280x2464]
> >>>>>>>> -> "csi2dc":0 [ENABLED]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> - entity 12: imx219 1-0010 (1 pad, 1 link)
> >>>>>>>> type V4L2 subdev subtype Sensor flags 0
> >>>>>>>> device node name /dev/v4l-subdev3
> >>>>>>>> pad0: Source
> >>>>>>>> [fmt:SRGGB10_1X10/3280x2464 field:none colorspace:srgb
> >>>>>>>> xfer:srgb ycbcr:601 quantization:full-range
> >>>>>>>> crop.bounds:(8,8)/3280x2464
> >>>>>>>> crop:(8,8)/3280x2464]
> >>>>>>>> -> "dw-csi.0":0 [ENABLED]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> - entity 24: atmel_isc_common (1 pad, 1 link)
> >>>>>>>> type Node subtype V4L flags 1
> >>>>>>>> device node name /dev/video0
> >>>>>>>> pad0: Sink
> >>>>>>>> <- "atmel_isc_scaler":1 [ENABLED,IMMUTABLE]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Scaler does this one cute little thing :
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> pad0: Sink
> >>>>>>>> [fmt:SRGGB10_1X10/3280x2464 field:none colorspace:srgb
> >>>>>>>> crop.bounds:(0,0)/3264x2464
> >>>>>>>> crop:(0,0)/3264x2464]
> >>>>>>>> <- "csi2dc":1 [ENABLED,IMMUTABLE]
> >>>>>>>> pad1: Source
> >>>>>>>> [fmt:SRGGB10_1X10/3280x2464 field:none colorspace:srgb]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Shouldn't this be 3264x2464 as that's what the entity outputs after
> >>>>>>> the cropping ? And shouldn't then be 3264x2464 the size output from
> >>>>>>> the video device too ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> That's right.
> >>>>>> I don't know why the source format for the scaler is still 3280x2464.
> >>>>>> Maybe there is a bug on g_fmt for it.. have to check it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks, I think this should be fixed ten
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Anyway, the video format is like this :
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> # v4l2-ctl --get-fmt-video
> >>>>>> Format Video Capture:
> >>>>>> Width/Height : 3264/2464
> >>>>>> Pixel Format : 'RGBP' (16-bit RGB 5-6-5)
> >>>>>> Field : None
> >>>>>> Bytes per Line : 6528
> >>>>>> Size Image : 16084992
> >>>>>> Colorspace : sRGB
> >>>>>> Transfer Function : Default (maps to sRGB)
> >>>>>> YCbCr/HSV Encoding: Default (maps to ITU-R 601)
> >>>>>> Quantization : Default (maps to Full Range)
> >>>>>> Flags :
> >>>>>> #
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> and initializing the pipeline looks fine from user perspective.
> >>>>>> The scaler is in fact the solution to make this pipeline work with
> >>>>>> libcamera.
> >>>>>> I found this cropping to be an issue in media controller when trying it
> >>>>>> with libcamera. Otherwise, the other user space apps which I was using
> >>>>>> never complained that anything was wrong
> >>>>>> Libcamera simply refuses to acknowledge the pipeline if the video output
> >>>>>> is 3264x2464 but there is no entity that changes the format from
> >>>>>> 3280x2464 down
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Not sure why libcamera should play a role there. Isn't it the media
> >>>>> pipeline validation that complains and returns an -EPIPE ?
> >>>>
> >>>> I tried this before the media_pipeline_start .
> >>>> Perhaps libcamera was doing some similar checks, anyway, it was
> >>>> complaining and not adding the stream, and reported no usable streams/camera
> >>>>
> >>>> Once I will rework some of the things according to your review I will
> >>>> run libcamera again to see what it complains about
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -> "atmel_isc_common":0 [ENABLED,IMMUTABLE]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Which is what we needed.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> +static int isc_scaler_enum_mbus_code(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct v4l2_subdev_state *sd_state,
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct v4l2_subdev_mbus_code_enum *code)
> >>>>>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct isc_device *isc = container_of(sd, struct isc_device, scaler_sd);
> >>>>>>>>>> + int supported_index = 0;
> >>>>>>>>>> + int i;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < isc->formats_list_size; i++) {
> >>>>>>>>>> + if (!isc->formats_list[i].sd_support)
> >>>>>>>>>> + continue;
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The sd_support flag still doesn't click in my head.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Shouldn't the enumeration of available formats on the scaler do not
> >>>>>>>>> depend on the sensor supproted formats ?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> You're right. I will have to check it again.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> + if (supported_index == code->index) {
> >>>>>>>>>> + code->code = isc->formats_list[i].mbus_code;
> >>>>>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>>>>> + supported_index++;
> >>>>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> +static int isc_scaler_g_sel(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct v4l2_subdev_state *sd_state,
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct v4l2_subdev_selection *sel)
> >>>>>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct isc_device *isc = container_of(sd, struct isc_device, scaler_sd);
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + if (sel->pad == ISC_SCALER_PAD_SOURCE)
> >>>>>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + if (sel->target != V4L2_SEL_TGT_CROP_BOUNDS &&
> >>>>>>>>>> + sel->target != V4L2_SEL_TGT_CROP)
> >>>>>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + sel->r.height = isc->max_height;
> >>>>>>>>>> + sel->r.width = isc->max_width;
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The CROP_BOUNDS should be set to the same size as the sink pad image format,
> >>>>>>>>> as it represents the maximum valid crop rectangle.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> TGT_CROP should report the configured crop rectangle which can be
> >>>>>>>>> intiialized to the same size as CROP_BOUNDS, if my understanding of
> >>>>>>>>> the spec is correct
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So you would like to have this differentiated, and report the
> >>>>>>>> CROP_BOUNDS to whatever is on the sink pad, and the TGT_CROP to what is
> >>>>>>>> reported now, the maximum size of the ISC frame .
> >>>>>>>> My understanding is correct ?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I didn't know you have an HW limitation, so your _BOUNDS is not the
> >>>>>>> input image size but rather 3264x2464 ( == max_width x max_height).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What I meant is that _BOUNDS should report the maximum rectangle size
> >>>>>>> that can be applied to the _CROP target. In you case you have an HW
> >>>>>>> limitation 3264x2464 and that's the largest rectangle you can apply.
> >>>>>> So the CROP should be at 3264x2464
> >>>>>>> TGT_CROP can be initialized to the same as _BOUND, but if you
> >>>>>>> implement s_selection it should report what has been there applied.
> >>>>>> and BOUND to actual frame size ?
> >>>>>>> But as you don't implement s_selection yet, I think this is fine for
> >>>>>>> now. Maybe a little comment ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It could also be the case where e.g. the sensor is outputting 1920x1080,
> >>>>>> in this case the scaler would do nothing.
> >>>>>> CROP is still 3264x2464 and BOUND in this case is 1920x1080 ?
> >>>>>> If the sensor is outputting 1920x1080, this format comes directly from
> >>>>>> the sensor (the sensor is cropping it from 3280x2464 or not... it's the
> >>>>>> sensor's problem)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Also, is set->r zeroed by the framework before getting here ?
> >>>>>>> Otherwise you should set r.left and r.top to 0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If these are redundant, no problem to remove them
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I was actually confused. I was suggesting you to add...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + sel->r.left = 0;
> >>>>>>>>>> + sel->r.top = 0;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> These ^
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So nothing to change. Sorry I've missed them
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>> j
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> +static int isc_scaler_init_cfg(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct v4l2_subdev_state *sd_state)
> >>>>>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *v4l2_try_fmt =
> >>>>>>>>>> + v4l2_subdev_get_try_format(sd, sd_state, 0);
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct isc_device *isc = container_of(sd, struct isc_device, scaler_sd);
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + *v4l2_try_fmt = isc->scaler_format;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> +static const struct v4l2_subdev_pad_ops isc_scaler_pad_ops = {
> >>>>>>>>>> + .enum_mbus_code = isc_scaler_enum_mbus_code,
> >>>>>>>>>> + .set_fmt = isc_scaler_set_fmt,
> >>>>>>>>>> + .get_fmt = isc_scaler_get_fmt,
> >>>>>>>>>> + .get_selection = isc_scaler_g_sel,
> >>>>>>>>>> + .init_cfg = isc_scaler_init_cfg,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> .link_validate = v4l2_subdev_link_validate_default,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> To have the formats at the end of links that point to this entity
> >>>>>>>>> validated (I think the framework already calls it if not set though,
> >>>>>>>>> please check v4l2-subdev.c:v4l2_subdev_link_validate())
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> +static const struct v4l2_subdev_ops xisc_scaler_subdev_ops = {
> >>>>>>>>>> + .pad = &isc_scaler_pad_ops,
> >>>>>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> +int isc_scaler_init(struct isc_device *isc)
> >>>>>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>>>>> + int ret;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + v4l2_subdev_init(&isc->scaler_sd, &xisc_scaler_subdev_ops);
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->scaler_sd.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->scaler_sd.dev = isc->dev;
> >>>>>>>>>> + snprintf(isc->scaler_sd.name, sizeof(isc->scaler_sd.name),
> >>>>>>>>>> + "atmel_isc_scaler");
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I would drop 'atmel' for brevity, unless other entities have this
> >>>>>>>>> prefix set already
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The v4l entity takes it's name from the module name, which is
> >>>>>>>> atmel_isc_common, so I thought to keep the prefix
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Ack!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->scaler_sd.flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_DEVNODE;
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->scaler_sd.entity.function = MEDIA_ENT_F_PROC_VIDEO_SCALER;
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->scaler_pads[ISC_SCALER_PAD_SINK].flags = MEDIA_PAD_FL_SINK;
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->scaler_pads[ISC_SCALER_PAD_SOURCE].flags = MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->scaler_format.height = isc->max_height;
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->scaler_format.width = isc->max_width;
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->scaler_format.code = isc->formats_list[0].mbus_code;
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->scaler_format.colorspace = V4L2_COLORSPACE_SRGB;
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->scaler_format.field = V4L2_FIELD_NONE;
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->scaler_format.ycbcr_enc = V4L2_YCBCR_ENC_DEFAULT;
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->scaler_format.quantization = V4L2_QUANTIZATION_DEFAULT;
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->scaler_format.xfer_func = V4L2_XFER_FUNC_DEFAULT;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + ret = media_entity_pads_init(&isc->scaler_sd.entity,
> >>>>>>>>>> + ISC_SCALER_PADS_NUM,
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->scaler_pads);
> >>>>>>>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
> >>>>>>>>>> + dev_err(isc->dev, "scaler sd media entity init failed\n");
> >>>>>>>>>> + return ret;
> >>>>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>>>>> + ret = v4l2_device_register_subdev(&isc->v4l2_dev, &isc->scaler_sd);
> >>>>>>>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
> >>>>>>>>>> + dev_err(isc->dev, "scaler sd failed to register subdev\n");
> >>>>>>>>>> + return ret;
> >>>>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + return ret;
> >>>>>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(isc_scaler_init);
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> +int isc_scaler_link(struct isc_device *isc)
> >>>>>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>>>>> + int ret;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + ret = media_create_pad_link(&isc->current_subdev->sd->entity,
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->remote_pad, &isc->scaler_sd.entity,
> >>>>>>>>>> + ISC_SCALER_PAD_SINK,
> >>>>>>>>>> + MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED |
> >>>>>>>>>> + MEDIA_LNK_FL_IMMUTABLE);
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
> >>>>>>>>>> + v4l2_err(&isc->v4l2_dev,
> >>>>>>>>>> + "Failed to create pad link: %s to %s\n",
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->current_subdev->sd->entity.name,
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->scaler_sd.entity.name);
> >>>>>>>>>> + return ret;
> >>>>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + dev_dbg(isc->dev, "link with %s pad: %d\n",
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->current_subdev->sd->name, isc->remote_pad);
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + ret = media_create_pad_link(&isc->scaler_sd.entity,
> >>>>>>>>>> + ISC_SCALER_PAD_SOURCE,
> >>>>>>>>>> + &isc->video_dev.entity, ISC_PAD_SINK,
> >>>>>>>>>> + MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED |
> >>>>>>>>>> + MEDIA_LNK_FL_IMMUTABLE);
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
> >>>>>>>>>> + v4l2_err(&isc->v4l2_dev,
> >>>>>>>>>> + "Failed to create pad link: %s to %s\n",
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->scaler_sd.entity.name,
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc->video_dev.entity.name);
> >>>>>>>>>> + return ret;
> >>>>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + dev_dbg(isc->dev, "link with %s pad: %d\n", isc->scaler_sd.name,
> >>>>>>>>>> + ISC_SCALER_PAD_SOURCE);
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + return ret;
> >>>>>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(isc_scaler_link);
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> From the DT graph point of view, the ISC appears as a single block
> >>>>>>>>> with an CSI-2 input port. It is then in charge of parsing the .dts and
> >>>>>>>>> add to its notifier the image sensor remote subdevice.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Actually it's only a parallel port.
> >>>>>>>> And it can be connected either to a sensor directly or to the csi2dc
> >>>>>>>> bridge. (the csi2dc bridge can be connected to a CSI-2 receiver)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> When the sensor subdev registers and the ISC notifier completes, the scaler
> >>>>>>>>> entity which was initialized at isc_probe() time is linked in between
> >>>>>>>>> the ISC and the image sensor immutably.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> yes, because this cannot change at runtime, and usually, it can't change
> >>>>>>>> without altering the board hardware. (at least this is what my
> >>>>>>>> understanding of immutability is )
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I think it is fine for now, but I wonder if you plan to plumb more
> >>>>>>>>> components between the ISC video node and the sensor, if it's not
> >>>>>>>>> worth changing the DT bindings and their parsing logic to separate the
> >>>>>>>>> CSI-2 receiver from the ISC, whcih can create its media graph at probe
> >>>>>>>>> time and have the CSI-2 receiver entity as downstream remote. I think
> >>>>>>>>> I need to get to know the ISC better to really have an idea. For now,
> >>>>>>>>> this seems ok to me, but please check with maintainers if this is fine
> >>>>>>>>> with them.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> In the XISC case (sama7g5-isc), the csi2dc receiver is the subdev (so,
> >>>>>>>> the remote subdev).
> >>>>>>>> The ISC will register a scaler, and connect the subdev to this scaler
> >>>>>>>> first, and then, the scaler to the isc itself (the v4l entity).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.h b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.h
> >>>>>>>>>> index 5fbf52a9080b..c9234c90ae58 100644
> >>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.h
> >>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.h
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -183,6 +183,17 @@ struct isc_reg_offsets {
> >>>>>>>>>> u32 his_entry;
> >>>>>>>>>> };
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +enum isc_mc_pads {
> >>>>>>>>>> + ISC_PAD_SINK = 0,
> >>>>>>>>>> + ISC_PADS_NUM = 1,
> >>>>>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> +enum isc_scaler_pads {
> >>>>>>>>>> + ISC_SCALER_PAD_SINK = 0,
> >>>>>>>>>> + ISC_SCALER_PAD_SOURCE = 1,
> >>>>>>>>>> + ISC_SCALER_PADS_NUM = 2,
> >>>>>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> /*
> >>>>>>>>>> * struct isc_device - ISC device driver data/config struct
> >>>>>>>>>> * @regmap: Register map
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -257,6 +268,12 @@ struct isc_reg_offsets {
> >>>>>>>>>> * be used as an input to the controller
> >>>>>>>>>> * @controller_formats_size: size of controller_formats array
> >>>>>>>>>> * @formats_list_size: size of formats_list array
> >>>>>>>>>> + * @pads: media controller pads for isc video entity
> >>>>>>>>>> + * @mdev: media device that is registered by the isc
> >>>>>>>>>> + * @remote_pad: remote pad on the connected subdevice
> >>>>>>>>>> + * @scaler_sd: subdevice for the scaler that isc registers
> >>>>>>>>>> + * @scaler_pads: media controller pads for the scaler subdevice
> >>>>>>>>>> + * @scaler_format: current format for the scaler subdevice
> >>>>>>>>>> */
> >>>>>>>>>> struct isc_device {
> >>>>>>>>>> struct regmap *regmap;
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -344,6 +361,19 @@ struct isc_device {
> >>>>>>>>>> struct isc_format *formats_list;
> >>>>>>>>>> u32 controller_formats_size;
> >>>>>>>>>> u32 formats_list_size;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct {
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct media_pad pads[ISC_PADS_NUM];
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct media_device mdev;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + u32 remote_pad;
> >>>>>>>>>> + };
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct {
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct v4l2_subdev scaler_sd;
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct media_pad scaler_pads[ISC_SCALER_PADS_NUM];
> >>>>>>>>>> + struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt scaler_format;
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Here are the scaler stuff which I added, in the same bulk struct for the
> >>>>>>>> whole isc device
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> + };
> >>>>>>>>>> };
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> extern const struct regmap_config isc_regmap_config;
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -355,4 +385,11 @@ int isc_clk_init(struct isc_device *isc);
> >>>>>>>>>> void isc_subdev_cleanup(struct isc_device *isc);
> >>>>>>>>>> void isc_clk_cleanup(struct isc_device *isc);
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +int isc_scaler_link(struct isc_device *isc);
> >>>>>>>>>> +int isc_scaler_init(struct isc_device *isc);
> >>>>>>>>>> +int isc_mc_init(struct isc_device *isc, u32 ver);
> >>>>>>>>>> +void isc_mc_cleanup(struct isc_device *isc);
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> +struct isc_format *isc_find_format_by_code(struct isc_device *isc,
> >>>>>>>>>> + unsigned int code, int *index);
> >>>>>>>>>> #endif
> >>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-sama5d2-isc.c b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-sama5d2-isc.c
> >>>>>>>>>> index c5b9563e36cb..c244682ea22f 100644
> >>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-sama5d2-isc.c
> >>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-sama5d2-isc.c
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -553,6 +553,12 @@ static int atmel_isc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>>>>>>>> break;
> >>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> + regmap_read(isc->regmap, ISC_VERSION + isc->offsets.version, &ver);
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I am surprised you can read a register before runtime_pm is
> >>>>>>>>> intialized!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Actually I can read any register after the moment of starting the clock
> >>>>>>>> on the hardware block.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Ah right then
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Maybe the starting and stopping of the clock needs to be moved to the
> >>>>>>>> runtime_pm calls, but this is another story, not related to the media
> >>>>>>>> controller.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It's fine, but maybe worth recording with a todo ?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>> j
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I moved this line because I had to pass the version to the isc_mc_init call
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>>>> j
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks for reviewing !
> >>>>>>>> Eugen
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + ret = isc_mc_init(isc, ver);
> >>>>>>>>>> + if (ret < 0)
> >>>>>>>>>> + goto isc_probe_mc_init_err;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
> >>>>>>>>>> pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> >>>>>>>>>> pm_request_idle(dev);
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -562,7 +568,7 @@ static int atmel_isc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>>>>>>>> ret = clk_prepare_enable(isc->ispck);
> >>>>>>>>>> if (ret) {
> >>>>>>>>>> dev_err(dev, "failed to enable ispck: %d\n", ret);
> >>>>>>>>>> - goto cleanup_subdev;
> >>>>>>>>>> + goto isc_probe_mc_init_err;
> >>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> /* ispck should be greater or equal to hclock */
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -572,7 +578,6 @@ static int atmel_isc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>>>>>>>> goto unprepare_clk;
> >>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> - regmap_read(isc->regmap, ISC_VERSION + isc->offsets.version, &ver);
> >>>>>>>>>> dev_info(dev, "Microchip ISC version %x\n", ver);
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> return 0;
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -580,6 +585,9 @@ static int atmel_isc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>>>>>>>> unprepare_clk:
> >>>>>>>>>> clk_disable_unprepare(isc->ispck);
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +isc_probe_mc_init_err:
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc_mc_cleanup(isc);
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> cleanup_subdev:
> >>>>>>>>>> isc_subdev_cleanup(isc);
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -600,6 +608,8 @@ static int atmel_isc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc_mc_cleanup(isc);
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> isc_subdev_cleanup(isc);
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> v4l2_device_unregister(&isc->v4l2_dev);
> >>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-sama7g5-isc.c b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-sama7g5-isc.c
> >>>>>>>>>> index 07a80b08bc54..9dc75eed0098 100644
> >>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-sama7g5-isc.c
> >>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-sama7g5-isc.c
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -547,15 +547,23 @@ static int microchip_xisc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>>>>>>>> break;
> >>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> + regmap_read(isc->regmap, ISC_VERSION + isc->offsets.version, &ver);
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> + ret = isc_mc_init(isc, ver);
> >>>>>>>>>> + if (ret < 0)
> >>>>>>>>>> + goto isc_probe_mc_init_err;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
> >>>>>>>>>> pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> >>>>>>>>>> pm_request_idle(dev);
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> - regmap_read(isc->regmap, ISC_VERSION + isc->offsets.version, &ver);
> >>>>>>>>>> dev_info(dev, "Microchip XISC version %x\n", ver);
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> return 0;
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +isc_probe_mc_init_err:
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc_mc_cleanup(isc);
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> cleanup_subdev:
> >>>>>>>>>> isc_subdev_cleanup(isc);
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -576,6 +584,8 @@ static int microchip_xisc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> + isc_mc_cleanup(isc);
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>> isc_subdev_cleanup(isc);
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> v4l2_device_unregister(&isc->v4l2_dev);
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> 2.25.1
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list