[PATCH] ACPI/IORT: Fix GCC 12 warning
Robin Murphy
robin.murphy at arm.com
Thu Feb 10 10:35:45 PST 2022
On 2022-02-10 18:27, Victor Erminpour wrote:
>
> On 2/10/22 10:06 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 2022-02-10 00:32, Victor Erminpour wrote:
>>> When building with automatic stack variable initialization, GCC 12
>>> complains about variables defined outside of switch case statements.
>>> Move the variable into the case that uses it, which silences the
>>> warning:
>>>
>>> ./drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c:1670:59: error: statement will never be
>>> executed [-Werror=switch-unreachable]
>>> 1670 | struct acpi_iort_named_component
>>> *ncomp;
>>> | ^~~~~
>>
>> Notwithstanding the fact that that warning is nonsensical, this patch
>> changes valid C code into invalid C code that doesn't even compile:
>>
>> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c: In function
>> ‘acpi_iort_dma_get_max_cpu_address’:
>> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c:1669:4: error: a label can only be part of a
>> statement and a declaration is not a statement
>> 1669 | struct acpi_iort_named_component *ncomp;
>> | ^~~~~~
>> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c:1676:4: error: a label can only be part of a
>> statement and a declaration is not a statement
>> 1676 | struct acpi_iort_root_complex *rc;
>> | ^~~~~~
>>
>> Robin.
>>
>
> Hi Robin,
>
> Thank you for your constructive criticism.
> Could the solution be enclosing the case statement in curly braces?
>
> I know this isn't a big issue for you, but this is a legitimate error
> for people
> building the kernel with GCC 12 and CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO enabled.
As Ard pointed out first, it is not a legitimate error, it is a spurious
error. The fact that you seemingly didn't get the label errors above,
nor even "ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
[-Wdeclaration-after-statement]", implies that GCC 12 currently has a
completely broken notion of declarations vs. statements with that option
enabled, so GCC 12 needs fixing.
Robin.
>
> Regards,
> --Victor
>
>
>
>>> Signed-off-by: Victor Erminpour <victor.erminpour at oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 8 +++-----
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>>> index 3b23fb775ac4..5c5d2e56d756 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>>> @@ -1645,7 +1645,7 @@ void __init acpi_iort_init(void)
>>> */
>>> phys_addr_t __init acpi_iort_dma_get_max_cpu_address(void)
>>> {
>>> - phys_addr_t limit = PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
>>> + phys_addr_t local_limit, limit = PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
>>> struct acpi_iort_node *node, *end;
>>> struct acpi_table_iort *iort;
>>> acpi_status status;
>>> @@ -1667,17 +1667,15 @@ phys_addr_t __init
>>> acpi_iort_dma_get_max_cpu_address(void)
>>> break;
>>> switch (node->type) {
>>> - struct acpi_iort_named_component *ncomp;
>>> - struct acpi_iort_root_complex *rc;
>>> - phys_addr_t local_limit;
>>> -
>>> case ACPI_IORT_NODE_NAMED_COMPONENT:
>>> + struct acpi_iort_named_component *ncomp;
>>> ncomp = (struct acpi_iort_named_component
>>> *)node->node_data;
>>> local_limit = DMA_BIT_MASK(ncomp->memory_address_limit);
>>> limit = min_not_zero(limit, local_limit);
>>> break;
>>> case ACPI_IORT_NODE_PCI_ROOT_COMPLEX:
>>> + struct acpi_iort_root_complex *rc;
>>> if (node->revision < 1)
>>> break;
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!ZcNRWTaQIb1uVqcZAusSzXd2kBnWuqAuICpxkOm6bOWBouQoFygbcIMJVUNp34LqhNrc$
>>
>>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list