[PATCH 1/2] perf: Add more generic branch types
Anshuman Khandual
anshuman.khandual at arm.com
Thu Feb 3 20:56:54 PST 2022
On 2/2/22 5:28 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi Anshuman,
>
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 11:14:12AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> This expands generic branch type classification by adding some more entries
>> , that can still be represented with the existing 4 bit 'type' field. While
^
>> here this also updates the x86 implementation with these new branch types.
>
> It looks like there's some whitespace damage here.
Are you referring the above ? I will have a look.
>
>>From a quick scan of the below, I think the "exception return" and "IRQ
> exception" types are somewhat generic, and could be added now (aside from any
> bikeshedding over names), but:
>
> * For IRQ vs FIQ, we might just want to have a top-level "asynchronous
> exception" type, and then further divide that with a separate field. That way
> it's easier to extend in future if new exceptions are added.
Okay. But that might lead to a hierarchical bit fields design where as the
current one is just linear.
>
> * I don't think the debug state entry/exits make sense as generic branch types,
>From BRBE perspective, a branch is any control flow change including exception
level change, debug enter, debug exit etc. If exception and its return can be
classified as 'branches' why not debug state change ? Are there no similar
debug states transition on other platforms ?
> since those are somewhat specific to the ARM architecutre, and it might make
> sense to define generic PERF_BR_ARCH* definitions instead.
Makes sense but corresponding bit field layout change in branch_sample_type
will remain a challenge.
>
> * Given the next patch extends the field, and therei are potential ABI problems
> with that, we might need to reserve a value for ABI extensibility purposes,
> and I suspect we need to do that *first*. More comments on the subsequent
> patch.
Sure, understood.
>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo at redhat.com>
>> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme at kernel.org>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
>> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin at linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa at redhat.com>
>> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung at kernel.org>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will at kernel.org>
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> Cc: linux-perf-users at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual at arm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 4 ++--
>> include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 5 +++++
>> tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 5 +++++
>> tools/perf/util/branch.c | 7 ++++++-
>> 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
>> index 8043213b75a5..9f86fac8c6a5 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
>> @@ -1336,10 +1336,10 @@ static int branch_map[X86_BR_TYPE_MAP_MAX] = {
>> PERF_BR_SYSCALL, /* X86_BR_SYSCALL */
>> PERF_BR_SYSRET, /* X86_BR_SYSRET */
>> PERF_BR_UNKNOWN, /* X86_BR_INT */
>> - PERF_BR_UNKNOWN, /* X86_BR_IRET */
>> + PERF_BR_EXPT_RET, /* X86_BR_IRET */
>> PERF_BR_COND, /* X86_BR_JCC */
>> PERF_BR_UNCOND, /* X86_BR_JMP */
>> - PERF_BR_UNKNOWN, /* X86_BR_IRQ */
>> + PERF_BR_IRQ, /* X86_BR_IRQ */
>> PERF_BR_IND_CALL, /* X86_BR_IND_CALL */
>> PERF_BR_UNKNOWN, /* X86_BR_ABORT */
>> PERF_BR_UNKNOWN, /* X86_BR_IN_TX */
>
> This presumably changes the values reported to userspace, so the commit message
> should mention that and explain why that is not a problem.
Okay.
>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> index 1b65042ab1db..b91d0f575d0c 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> @@ -251,6 +251,11 @@ enum {
>> PERF_BR_SYSRET = 8, /* syscall return */
>> PERF_BR_COND_CALL = 9, /* conditional function call */
>> PERF_BR_COND_RET = 10, /* conditional function return */
>> + PERF_BR_EXPT_RET = 11, /* exception return */
>
> We don't use 'EXPT' anywhere else, so it might be better to just use 'ERET'.
> IIUC that's the naming the x86 FRED stuff is going to use anyhow.
Sure, will change.
>
>> + PERF_BR_IRQ = 12, /* irq */
>
> This looks somewhat generic, so adding it now makes sense to me, but ...
>
>> + PERF_BR_FIQ = 13, /* fiq */
>
> ... this is arguably just a idfferent class of interrupt from the PoV of Linux,
> and the naming is ARM-specific, so I don't think this makes sense to add *now*.
I assume 'now' --> without ABI extension.
> As above, maybe it would be better to have a generic "aynchronous exception" or
> "interrupt" type, and a separate field to distinguish specific types of those.
>
>> + PERF_BR_DEBUG_HALT = 14, /* debug halt */
>> + PERF_BR_DEBUG_EXIT = 15, /* debug exit */
>
> For the benefit of those not familiar with the ARM architecture, "debug halt"
> and "debug exit" usually refer to "debug state", which is what an external
> (e.g. JTAG) debugger uses rather than the usual self-hosted debug stuff that
> Linux uses.
>
> Given that, I'm not sure these are very generic, and I suspect it would be
> better to have more generic PERF_BR_ARCH_* entries for things like this.
Sure, will try and come up with something similar.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
>> PERF_BR_MAX,
>> };
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> index 4cd39aaccbe7..1882054e8684 100644
>> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> @@ -251,6 +251,11 @@ enum {
>> PERF_BR_SYSRET = 8, /* syscall return */
>> PERF_BR_COND_CALL = 9, /* conditional function call */
>> PERF_BR_COND_RET = 10, /* conditional function return */
>> + PERF_BR_EXPT_RET = 11, /* exception return */
>> + PERF_BR_IRQ = 12, /* irq */
>> + PERF_BR_FIQ = 13, /* fiq */
>> + PERF_BR_DEBUG_HALT = 14, /* debug halt */
>> + PERF_BR_DEBUG_EXIT = 15, /* debug exit */
>> PERF_BR_MAX,
>> };
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/branch.c b/tools/perf/util/branch.c
>> index 2285b1eb3128..74e5e67b1779 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/branch.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/branch.c
>> @@ -49,7 +49,12 @@ const char *branch_type_name(int type)
>> "SYSCALL",
>> "SYSRET",
>> "COND_CALL",
>> - "COND_RET"
>> + "COND_RET",
>> + "EXPT_RET",
>> + "IRQ",
>> + "FIQ",
>> + "DEBUG_HALT",
>> + "DEBUG_EXIT"
>> };
>>
>> if (type >= 0 && type < PERF_BR_MAX)
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list