[RFC PATCH v4 07/12] media: imx219: Rename mbus codes array

Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Thu Feb 3 18:51:34 PST 2022


Hi Jean-Michel,

Thank you for the patch.

On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 06:50:04PM +0100, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> The imx219 is using the name codes[] for the mbus format which is not
> easy to read and know what it means. Change it to imx219_mbus_formats.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jeanmichel.hautbois at ideasonboard.com>

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>

> ---
>  drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
> index e10af3f74b38..74dba5e61201 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
> @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static const char * const imx219_supply_name[] = {
>   * - v flip
>   * - h&v flips
>   */
> -static const u32 codes[] = {
> +static const u32 imx219_mbus_formats[] = {
>  	MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB10_1X10,
>  	MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG10_1X10,
>  	MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGBRG10_1X10,
> @@ -655,17 +655,17 @@ static u32 imx219_get_format_code(struct imx219 *imx219, u32 code)
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&imx219->mutex);
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(codes); i++)
> -		if (codes[i] == code)
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(imx219_mbus_formats); i++)
> +		if (imx219_mbus_formats[i] == code)
>  			break;
>  
> -	if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE(codes))
> +	if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE(imx219_mbus_formats))
>  		i = 0;
>  
>  	i = (i & ~3) | (imx219->vflip->val ? 2 : 0) |
>  	    (imx219->hflip->val ? 1 : 0);
>  
> -	return codes[i];
> +	return imx219_mbus_formats[i];
>  }
>  
>  static void imx219_set_default_format(struct imx219 *imx219)
> @@ -808,11 +808,11 @@ static int imx219_enum_mbus_code(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
>  {
>  	struct imx219 *imx219 = to_imx219(sd);
>  
> -	if (code->index >= (ARRAY_SIZE(codes) / 4))
> +	if (code->index >= (ARRAY_SIZE(imx219_mbus_formats) / 4))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&imx219->mutex);
> -	code->code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219, codes[code->index * 4]);
> +	code->code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219, imx219_mbus_formats[code->index * 4]);
>  	mutex_unlock(&imx219->mutex);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -908,14 +908,14 @@ static int imx219_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&imx219->mutex);
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(codes); i++)
> -		if (codes[i] == fmt->format.code)
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(imx219_mbus_formats); i++)
> +		if (imx219_mbus_formats[i] == fmt->format.code)
>  			break;
> -	if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE(codes))
> +	if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE(imx219_mbus_formats))
>  		i = 0;
>  
>  	/* Bayer order varies with flips */
> -	fmt->format.code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219, codes[i]);
> +	fmt->format.code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219, imx219_mbus_formats[i]);
>  
>  	mode = v4l2_find_nearest_size(supported_modes,
>  				      ARRAY_SIZE(supported_modes),

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list