[RESEND PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: define support for name based regulators
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Thu Feb 3 03:28:30 PST 2022
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 04:09:43PM -0800, David Collins wrote:
> On 2/2/22 9:38 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This seems like a scenario where the DT should be being generated at
> > runtime along with the virtualisation of the platform? TBH a setup
> > where this is an issue feels like it's asking for trouble.
> I'm not familiar with runtime device tree generation. Could you please
> point to an example of it or documentation for it? How would this
> handle kernel devices on the VM side which need a phandle to an
> scmi-regulator DT subnode in order to get a pointer to the corresponding
> regulator device at runtime via devm_regulator_get()?
I believe qemu does this for the virt machine. I'm not sure what you're
seeing as particularly complex about generating regulator links in
particular though?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20220203/5dc56135/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list