[PATCH v3 1/2] arm: dts: arm: add arm corstone500 device tree
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzk at kernel.org
Thu Dec 22 06:01:01 PST 2022
On 22/12/2022 13:32, Emekcan Aras wrote:
> Corstone500[0] is a platform from arm, which includes Cortex-A cores and
> ideal starting point for feature rich System on Chip (SoC) designs
> based on the Cortex-A5 core.
Use subject prefixes matching the subsystem (git log --oneline -- ...).
You got this comment already and you did not follow it.
>
> These device trees contains the necessary bits to support the
> Corstone 500 FVP (Fixed Virtual Platform) and the
> FPGA MPS3 board.
>
> 0: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/102262/0000
>
> Signed-off-by: Emekcan Aras <emekcan.aras at arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 3 +-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/corstone500.dts | 182 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/corstone500.dts
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> index 6aa7dc4db2fc..4dc4df0707dc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> @@ -1465,7 +1465,8 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_VEXPRESS) += \
> vexpress-v2p-ca5s.dtb \
> vexpress-v2p-ca9.dtb \
> vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1.dtb \
> - vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dtb
> + vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dtb \
> + corstone500.dtb
Wrong order. v is not before c.
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_VIRT) += \
> xenvm-4.2.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_VT8500) += \
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/corstone500.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/corstone500.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..bcca7d736c85
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/corstone500.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 or MIT
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2022, Arm Limited. All rights reserved.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +
Second ignored comment. I'll stop review.
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
requested changes or keep discussing them.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list