Kernel Kernel bug caused by (cpufreq: mediatek: Refine mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking()) on Banana Pi R64 (MT7622)

Allen-KH Cheng (程冠勳) Allen-KH.Cheng at mediatek.com
Mon Dec 19 04:21:26 PST 2022


Hi Nick,

This issue doesn't seem to be going to happen.
Is there anything else we need help confirming?

Thanks,
Allen

-----Original Message-----
From: Linux-mediatek <linux-mediatek-bounces at lists.infradead.org> On
Behalf Of Nick
Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 11:35 PM
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>; AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>
Cc: Allen-KH Cheng (程冠勳) <Allen-KH.Cheng at mediatek.com>; 
linux-pm at vger.kernel.org; daniel at makrotopia.org;
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group <
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group at mediatek.com>; Rex-BC Chen (陳柏辰) <
Rex-BC.Chen at mediatek.com>; Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions at leemhuis.info
>; linux-mediatek at lists.infradead.org; matthias.bgg at gmail.com; 
thomas.huehn at hs-nordhausen.de; Jia-wei Chang (張佳偉) <
Jia-wei.Chang at mediatek.com>; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; 
regressions at lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: Kernel Kernel bug caused by (cpufreq: mediatek: Refine
mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking()) on Banana Pi R64 (MT7622)

Did something changed on master? I compiled now the image I use on the
BPI-R64 a bit differently.
I used the openwrt toolchain "aarch64-openwrt-linux-musl-" to cross-
compile the original linux repository on current master. Than I
compiled with OpenWrt-Buildsystem a initramfs, put that together with
mkimage to a "itb" and booted it. Suddenly it works:

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://gist.githubusercontent.com/PolynomialDivision/5e49529206ba5d273bf6a416c42c6234/raw/7ecff7be397a6e9a41ef120c3fa61060c488cf5b/mt7622-bpi-vanilla__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!glNhziJx8pjvVsVoRm0LO8wshXJL_b2P_jYV5vO_9uhe1EnbMpWRnIEcj_561Ijxurd8C-Fjc7uCbBNIM_E-7YYc$ 
 

Bests
Nick

On 12/2/22 12:01, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 02-12-22, 12:00, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> > If Viresh can add those while applying the patch, that's fine for
> > me 
> > - otherwise I can send a v2 adding the two suggested missing tags.
> 
> Sure, no problem.
> 




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list