[PATCH v3] firmware: xilinx: Clear IOCTL_SET_SD_TAPDELAY using PM_MMIO_WRITE

Marek Vasut marex at denx.de
Thu Dec 15 07:20:23 PST 2022


In case the tap delay required by Arasan SDHCI is set to 0, the current
embeddedsw firmware unconditionally writes IOU_SLCR SD_ITAPDLY to 0x100
(SD0_ITAPDLYENA=1, SD0_ITAPDLYSEL=0). Previous behavior was to keep the
IOU_SLCR SD_ITAPDLY set to 0x0. There is some sort of difference in the
behavior between SD0_ITAPDLYENA=1/0 with the same SD0_ITAPDLYSEL=0, even
though the behavior should be identical -- zero delay added to rxclk_in
line. The former breaks HS200 training in low temperature conditions.

Write IOU_SLCR SD_ITAPDLY register to 0 using PM_MMIO_WRITE which seem
to allow unrestricted WRITE access (and PM_MMIO_READ which allows read
access) to the entire address space. This way, it is possible to work
around the defect in IOCTL_SET_SD_TAPDELAY design which does not permit
clearing SDx_ITAPDLYENA bit.

Note that the embeddedsw firmware does not permit clearing the SD_ITAPDLY
SD0_ITAPDLYENA bit, this bit can only ever be set by the firmware and it
is often impossible to update the possibly broken firmware.

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
---
Cc: Abhyuday Godhasara <abhyuday.godhasara at xilinx.com>
Cc: Harsha <harsha.harsha at xilinx.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek at amd.com>
Cc: Rajan Vaja <rajan.vaja at xilinx.com>
Cc: Ronak Jain <ronak.jain at xilinx.com>
Cc: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah at xilinx.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
---
V2: - Use PM_MMIO_WRITE to clear SD_xTAPDLYx bitfields and work around
      the IOCTL_SET_SD_TAPDELAY design defect.
    - Update commit message accordingly.
V3: - Move SD_ITAPDLY, SD_OTAPDLYSEL to include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h
---
 drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c     | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h |  4 ++++
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c b/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
index 129f68d7a6f53..acd83d29c8667 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
@@ -738,8 +738,31 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zynqmp_pm_get_pll_frac_data);
  */
 int zynqmp_pm_set_sd_tapdelay(u32 node_id, u32 type, u32 value)
 {
-	return zynqmp_pm_invoke_fn(PM_IOCTL, node_id, IOCTL_SET_SD_TAPDELAY,
-				   type, value, NULL);
+	u32 reg = (type == PM_TAPDELAY_INPUT) ? SD_ITAPDLY : SD_OTAPDLYSEL;
+	u32 mask = (node_id == NODE_SD_0) ? GENMASK(15, 0) : GENMASK(31, 16);
+
+	if (value) {
+		return zynqmp_pm_invoke_fn(PM_IOCTL, node_id,
+					   IOCTL_SET_SD_TAPDELAY,
+					   type, value, NULL);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Work around completely misdesigned firmware API on Xilinx ZynqMP.
+	 * The IOCTL_SET_SD_TAPDELAY firmware call allows the caller to only
+	 * ever set IOU_SLCR SD_ITAPDLY Register SD0_ITAPDLYENA/SD1_ITAPDLYENA
+	 * bits, but there is no matching call to clear those bits. If those
+	 * bits are not cleared, SDMMC tuning may fail.
+	 *
+	 * Luckily, there are PM_MMIO_READ/PM_MMIO_WRITE calls which seem to
+	 * allow complete unrestricted access to all address space, including
+	 * IOU_SLCR SD_ITAPDLY Register and all the other registers, access
+	 * to which was supposed to be protected by the current firmware API.
+	 *
+	 * Use PM_MMIO_READ/PM_MMIO_WRITE to re-implement the missing counter
+	 * part of IOCTL_SET_SD_TAPDELAY which clears SDx_ITAPDLYENA bits.
+	 */
+	return zynqmp_pm_invoke_fn(PM_MMIO_WRITE, reg, mask, 0, 0, NULL);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zynqmp_pm_set_sd_tapdelay);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h b/include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h
index b986e267d149b..eb88b4ba62f98 100644
--- a/include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h
+++ b/include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h
@@ -79,6 +79,10 @@
 #define EVENT_ERROR_PSM_ERR1	(0x28108000U)
 #define EVENT_ERROR_PSM_ERR2	(0x2810C000U)
 
+/* ZynqMP SD tap delay tuning */
+#define SD_ITAPDLY	0xFF180314
+#define SD_OTAPDLYSEL	0xFF180318
+
 enum pm_api_cb_id {
 	PM_INIT_SUSPEND_CB = 30,
 	PM_ACKNOWLEDGE_CB = 31,
-- 
2.35.1




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list