[RFC PATCH 05/37] KVM: x86/mmu: Unify TDP MMU and Shadow MMU root refcounts
David Matlack
dmatlack at google.com
Thu Dec 8 11:38:25 PST 2022
Use the same field for refcounting roots in the TDP MMU and Shadow MMU.
The atomicity provided by refcount_t is overkill for the Shadow MMU,
since it holds the write-lock. But converging this field will enable a
future commit to more easily move struct kvm_mmu_page to common code.
Note, refcount_dec_and_test() returns true if the resulting refcount is
0. Hence the check in mmu_free_root_page() is inverted to check if
shadow root refcount is 0.
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack at google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 14 +++++++-------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h | 6 ++----
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmutrace.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 8 ++++----
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h | 2 +-
5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index f7668a32721d..11cef930d5ed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -2498,14 +2498,14 @@ static bool __kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(struct kvm *kvm,
if (sp->unsync)
kvm_unlink_unsync_page(kvm, sp);
- if (!sp->root_count) {
+ if (!refcount_read(&sp->root_refcount)) {
/* Count self */
(*nr_zapped)++;
/*
* Already invalid pages (previously active roots) are not on
* the active page list. See list_del() in the "else" case of
- * !sp->root_count.
+ * !sp->root_refcount.
*/
if (sp->role.invalid)
list_add(&sp->link, invalid_list);
@@ -2515,7 +2515,7 @@ static bool __kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(struct kvm *kvm,
} else {
/*
* Remove the active root from the active page list, the root
- * will be explicitly freed when the root_count hits zero.
+ * will be explicitly freed when the root_refcount hits zero.
*/
list_del(&sp->link);
@@ -2570,7 +2570,7 @@ static void kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page(struct kvm *kvm,
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
list_for_each_entry_safe(sp, nsp, invalid_list, link) {
- WARN_ON(!sp->role.invalid || sp->root_count);
+ WARN_ON(!sp->role.invalid || refcount_read(&sp->root_refcount));
kvm_mmu_free_shadow_page(sp);
}
}
@@ -2593,7 +2593,7 @@ static unsigned long kvm_mmu_zap_oldest_mmu_pages(struct kvm *kvm,
* Don't zap active root pages, the page itself can't be freed
* and zapping it will just force vCPUs to realloc and reload.
*/
- if (sp->root_count)
+ if (refcount_read(&sp->root_refcount))
continue;
unstable = __kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(kvm, sp, &invalid_list,
@@ -3481,7 +3481,7 @@ static void mmu_free_root_page(struct kvm *kvm, hpa_t *root_hpa,
if (is_tdp_mmu_page(sp))
kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(kvm, sp, false);
- else if (!--sp->root_count && sp->role.invalid)
+ else if (refcount_dec_and_test(&sp->root_refcount) && sp->role.invalid)
kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(kvm, sp, invalid_list);
*root_hpa = INVALID_PAGE;
@@ -3592,7 +3592,7 @@ static hpa_t mmu_alloc_root(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn, int quadrant,
WARN_ON_ONCE(role.arch.direct && role.arch.has_4_byte_gpte);
sp = kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(vcpu, gfn, role);
- ++sp->root_count;
+ refcount_inc(&sp->root_refcount);
return __pa(sp->spt);
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
index c1a379fba24d..fd4990c8b0e9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
@@ -87,10 +87,8 @@ struct kvm_mmu_page {
u64 *shadowed_translation;
/* Currently serving as active root */
- union {
- int root_count;
- refcount_t tdp_mmu_root_count;
- };
+ refcount_t root_refcount;
+
unsigned int unsync_children;
union {
struct kvm_rmap_head parent_ptes; /* rmap pointers to parent sptes */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmutrace.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmutrace.h
index 6a4a43b90780..ffd10ce3eae3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmutrace.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmutrace.h
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
__entry->mmu_valid_gen = sp->mmu_valid_gen; \
__entry->gfn = sp->gfn; \
__entry->role = sp->role.word; \
- __entry->root_count = sp->root_count; \
+ __entry->root_count = refcount_read(&sp->root_refcount); \
__entry->unsync = sp->unsync;
#define KVM_MMU_PAGE_PRINTK() ({ \
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index fc0b87ceb1ea..34d674080170 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
{
kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(kvm, shared);
- if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count))
+ if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&root->root_refcount))
return;
/*
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
* zap the root because a root cannot go from invalid to valid.
*/
if (!kvm_tdp_root_mark_invalid(root)) {
- refcount_set(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count, 1);
+ refcount_set(&root->root_refcount, 1);
/*
* Zapping the root in a worker is not just "nice to have";
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ hpa_t kvm_tdp_mmu_get_vcpu_root_hpa(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
root = tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(vcpu);
tdp_mmu_init_sp(root, NULL, 0, role);
- refcount_set(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count, 1);
+ refcount_set(&root->root_refcount, 1);
spin_lock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
list_add_rcu(&root->link, &kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots);
@@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ static void tdp_mmu_zap_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
* and lead to use-after-free as zapping a SPTE triggers "writeback" of
* dirty accessed bits to the SPTE's associated struct page.
*/
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!refcount_read(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count));
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!refcount_read(&root->root_refcount));
kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(kvm, shared);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
index 18d3719f14ea..19d3153051a3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ hpa_t kvm_tdp_mmu_get_vcpu_root_hpa(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
__must_check static inline bool kvm_tdp_mmu_get_root(struct kvm_mmu_page *root)
{
- return refcount_inc_not_zero(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count);
+ return refcount_inc_not_zero(&root->root_refcount);
}
void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
--
2.39.0.rc1.256.g54fd8350bd-goog
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list