[PATCH 00/14] staging: vc04_services: bcm2835-isp support

[Stefan Wahren]

Hi Umang,

Am 30.11.22 um 11:58 schrieb Umang Jain:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On 11/27/22 6:56 AM, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>> Hi Umang,
>>
>> Am 26.11.22 um 17:26 schrieb Umang Jain:
>>> Hi Stefan
>>>
>>> On 11/26/22 8:12 PM, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>>>> Hi Umang,
>>>>
>>>> Am 21.11.22 um 22:47 schrieb Umang Jain:
>>>>> This series aims to upport bcm2835-isp from the RPi kernel [1] and 
>>>>> is a
>>>>> independent subset of earlier series [2] posted to upport CSI-2/CCP2
>>>>> receiver IP core("Unicam) + the ISP driver found in BCM283x and 
>>>>> compatible
>>>>> SoCs (namely BCM2711). Unicam is still under active development to 
>>>>> work
>>>>> with multistream support to get into mainline. Hence only the ISP 
>>>>> driver
>>>>> will remain the primary area of this series.
>>>>
>>>> thanks for working on this. But honestly i would prefer that vchiq 
>>>> comes out of staging before adding more features. As Greg said some 
>>>> time ago staging is not a place to "dump code and run away". These 
>>>> new files are in the same bad shape as the rest of vc04 before the 
>>>> clean-up here in staging started.
>>>
>>> Certainly, I am not here to do that - but I am still learning the 
>>> ropes.
>> no problem.
>>>
>>> If the staging issue is becoming a blocker for bcm2835-isp going 
>>> upstream, I would be happy to help here! Though I must mention that 
>>> I still have limited visibility so my aim would be to chart out a 
>>> plan of things needed to be done to get vc04_services out of staging!
>>
>> The vchiq driver is in staging since 2016, so every step forwards is 
>> good. Unfortunately all of the low hanging fruits has been gathered.
>>
>> For me the most important, but not to tricky steps to get vchiq out 
>> of staging would be:
>>
>> * Cleanup logging mechanism
>>
>> * Get rid of custom function return values
>>
>> There was already an attempt for this [1]
>>
>> * Get rid of all non essential global structures and create a proper per
>> device structure
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I agree that VCSM is on the TODO list for vchiq, but this driver is 
>>>> not necessary for making bcm2835-audio & bcm2835-camera leave 
>>>> staging. It just binds more resources on a new feature.
>
> bcm2835-camera is the legacy camera stack which probably need to be 
> dropped from hereon...
I don't not know if there any users left, so i would be careful here. 
Can bcm2835-isp completely replace bcm2835-camera? Sorry, for this dumb 
question but i'm not expert here.
>>>
>>> I see two TODO files in vc04_services:
>>>     ./bcm2835-camera/TODO
>>>     ./interface/TODO
>>>
>>> One of the bcm2835-camera TODO points to the vc-sm-cma driver 
>>> itself. So that's address in the series. The other remaining one - I 
>>> will need to take a deeper look before commenting on it.
>>>
>>> The main chunk of TODO are in vc04_services/interfaces/TODO. Doing a 
>>> cursory reading of them suggests that these apply to *all* 
>>> vc04_services components? Am I right?
>> Actually these applies just for the interfaces directory. Some of 
>> them could apply to the services, but this is no priority.
>
> By no priority, you mean this doesn't affect the criteria required to 
> ful-fill to get these out of staging?
Correct
>>>
>>> Are these are the specific bits of cleanup you are referring to in 
>>> your comment?
>>
>> You mean about bcm2835-isp? There were too many changes to vchiq that 
>> i don't remember them all. The first that come to my mind was those 
>> fancy comment sections which is not kernel coding style. It has been 
>> removed.
>
> No, I don't mean the bcm2835-isp changes (those are upcoming / 
> out-of-tree still so...). I mean what are the specific bits / points 
> that needs to be addressed to get vc04_services out of the staging.
These were the points which i mentioned in my last email. They came from 
interface/TODO.
>
> You have mentioned it above now, so I'll follow up on those.
That would be great :)
> The many vchiq changes you referred to above comment (that you don't 
> remember) are from [1] as well or some other series ?
Sorry, for the confusing. The many changes i refer were the dozens of 
clean up patches for vc04_interfaces in mainline staging since the last 
years. [1] was just a single patch which has been accepted yet.
>
>>
>> [1] - 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20220712181928.17547-1-jslebodn@redhat.com/
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Unfortuntately i hadn't much time to work on vchiq by myself.
>>>>
>>>> Just my two cents
>>>> Stefan
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>