[PATCH v3 1/1] regulator: dt-bindings: mediatek: add mt6366

zhiyong.tao zhiyong.tao at mediatek.com
Tue Aug 23 05:42:10 PDT 2022


On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 15:57 +0300, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/08/2022 15:54, zhiyong.tao wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-08-12 at 15:55 +0300, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 at 15:52, zhiyong.tao <
> > > zhiyong.tao at mediatek.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On Fri, 2022-08-12 at 13:55 +0300, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > > > On 12/08/2022 12:29, Zhiyong Tao wrote:
> > > > > > Add mt6366 regulator document
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +properties:
> > > > > > +  compatible:
> > > > > > +    const: mediatek,mt6366-regulator
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +  regulators:
> > > > > > +    type: object
> > > > > > +    description: List of regulators and its properties
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +    patternProperties:
> > > > > > +      "^buck-
> > > > > > v(dram1|core|coresshub|proc11|proc12|gpu|s2|modem|s1)$":
> > > > > > +        type: object
> > > > > > +        $ref: regulator.yaml#
> > > > > > +        unevaluatedProperties: false
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +      "^ldo-
> > > > > > v(dram2|sim1|ibr|rf12|usb|camio|camd|cn18|fe28)$":
> > > > > > +        type: object
> > > > > > +        $ref: regulator.yaml#
> > > > > 
> > > > > You miss unevaluatedProperties in most of the places.
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Krzysztof,
> > > >    Thanks for your suggestion,
> > > >    Do you mean that all places should have the
> > > > unevaluatedProperties
> > > > Properties ?
> > > 
> > > Yes. You put it in some of the places which does not really make
> > > sense...
> > 
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >    Thanks for your suggestion,
> >    We find that if there is a properties "compatible = "regulator-
> > fixed";" in ldo-vrf12, we should set unevaluatedProperties as true.
> > or it will check yaml warning "Unevaluated Properties are not
> > allowed('compatible' was unexpected)". is it right?
> >    There is a properties "compatible = "regulator-fixed";"in ldo-
> > vrf12.
> > It will cause the checking yaml error "ldo-vrf12: 'regulator-name'
> > is a
> > required property". Can you help to give a suggestion to fix the
> > warning? Add regulator-name for ldo-vrf12 or other suggestion?
> > 
> 
> And how this regulator is supposed to work? Are you populating DT
> children in your driver?
==>
Hi Krzysztof, we will remove the properties "compatible = "regulator-
fixed" for some ldo. It won't any check error.

Thanks

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list